Part
1: 2001/09/22 - 2001/12/31
Part 2: 2002/01/04 - 2002/06/18
Part 3: 2002/07/08 - 2002/11/30
Part
4: 2002/12/01 - 2003/04/29
Part
5: 2003/05/01 -
May
2003
"Saudi
Chutzpah" (James Taranto, Best of
the Web Today, 2003/05/01)
April
2003
"US to withdraw forces from Saudi Arabia" (Peter
Spiegel, Financial Times, 2003/04/29)
"Islamic Radicals On Campus"
(Erick Stakelbeck, Front Page Magazine, 2003/04/23)
"PLO gets more than SR 1.8 million
from the popular committee for assisting the Palestinian Mujahideen"
(IMRA, 2003/04/22)
"Don't listen to the Arab
elites, the Iraqis didn't and they're the ones cheering today"
(Amir Taheri, The Times, 2003/04/10)
"Arabs react with dismay,
disbelief to news of US troops in Baghdad" (Donna Abu-Nasr,
AP/Boston.com, 2003/04/07)
March
2003
"With Friends Like These" (Michael Isikoff and
Mark Hosenball, Newsweek, 2003/03/26)
February
2003
"Saudis launch first al-Qaeda trial" (Magdi Abdelhadi,
BBC News, 2003/02/18)
"Our Friends the Saudis" (James
Taranto, Best of the Web Today, 2003/02/05)
"The
West, Christians and Jews in Saudi Arabian Schoolbooks"
(The American Jewish Committe. 2003/02/04)
"Saudis
Aided Subpoenaed Woman's Trip Out of U.S." (Susan Schmidt,
The Washington Post, 2003/02/05)
"'The Shah Always Falls'" (Fredric
Smoler, American Heritage, from the February/March 2003 issue)
January
2003
"Saudi Arabia, Negev" (Traditional women's costume
in muslim countries)
"Saudi Shopping, Saudi Arabia,
Riyadh" (Traditional women's costume in muslim countries)
"Objects and pariahs"
(Diane West, The Washington Times, 2003/01/17)
"Saudi Women's Rights"
(Charles Johnson, Little Green Footballs, 2003/01/12)
"The Scandal of U.S.-Saudi
Relations" (Daniel Pipes, National Interest/danielpipes.org,
from the Winter 2002/03 issue)
"Briton admits Saudi bomb
murder" (Michael Theodolou and Daniel McGrory, The Times,
2003/01/07)
"Saudis gave Al Qaida $500
million and never stopped giving" (World Tribune.com, 2003/01/05)
"Questions
about Saudi crackdown" (Lisa Myers, NBC News, 2003/01/02)
December
2002
"Who's Who in the House of Saud"
(Aram Roston, The New York Times Magazine, from the 2002/12/22 issue)
"Preliminary Overview. - Saudi Arabia's
Education System: Curriculum, Spreading Saudi Education to the World
and the Official Saudi Position on Education Policy" (Steven
Stalinsky, MEMRI, 2002/12/20)
"Saudis Behaving Badly" (Joel
Mowbray, National Review, 2002/12/20)
"Democracy and Islam After September 11"
(Stephen Schwartz, The Weekly Standard, from the 2002/12/23 issue)
"Who is Prince Nayef?" (Bill Tierney,
The Weekly Standard, from the 2002/12/23 issue)
"Initiatives and Actions Taken by the Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia to Combat Terrorism" (The Royal Embassy
of Saudi Arabia/The Wall Street Journal, 2002/12/12)
"What Riyadh Buys" (Daniel Pipes,
New York Post/danielpipes.org, 2002/12/11)
"Saudi Stench" (Stephen Schwartz,
FrontPageMagazine, 2002/12/09)
"A Wahhabism Problem" (Andrew
G. Bostom, National Review, 2002/12/06)
"Saudis rally neighbors against post-Saddam
democracy" (World Tribune.com, 2002/12/04)
"Saudi diplomat named in suit"
(David Wastell, Sunday Telegraph/The Washington Times, 2002/12/02)
"Charity and Terror" (Michael
Isikoff and Mark Hosenball, Newsweek, from the 2002/12/09 issue)
"Saudi
Chutzpah" (James Taranto, Best of the Web Today,
2003/05/01)
"Here's something a little different: the first Best of the Web
Today blind tasting. See if you can identify the vintage and origin
of this fine whine:
During
this crisis patriotism as practiced in the United States reached alarming
levels of intolerance and violence. The right of the other to dissent
was unceremoniously thrown aside. If we take what happened to the
Dixie Chicks as an example, one is hard-pressed to justify or even
comprehend the incident. One of the ladies said she was ashamed of
Bush being from her home state of Texas. She said it while performing
on a stage in London. Had the Chicks been living under Saddam, we
know a priori what would have happened. But knowing they lived in
the United States one thought that the debate would have maintained
a semblance of civility.
Instead, they were attacked, taken off radio stations, and callers
to the same stations spewed so much venom that it inevitably culminated
in on-the-air death threats. Obviously, democracy is skin deep.
California
2003? Nope, Saudi Arabia. It's an Arab News op-ed by one Mohammad T.
Al-Rasheed. If the Dixie Chicks lived in Rasheed's country, of course,
they would not even have been able to go to Britain to deliver their
anti-Bush comments unless they had the permission of their "guardians"
- fathers or husbands. Nor would they be allowed to drive, appear naked
on magazine covers or even show their ankles in public." (See
also: "The
Dixie Chicks & Civility" (Dr. Mohammed T. Al-Rasheed, Arab
News, 2003/05/01))
"US
to withdraw forces from Saudi Arabia" (Peter
Spiegel, Financial Times, 2003/04/29)
"The US and Saudi Arabia announced on Tuesday that nearly all American
forces would withdraw from the desert kingdom at the end of the summer
after more than a decade of using Saudi bases as its primary Gulf air
presence.
In a joint press conference with his Saudi counterpart, Donald Rumsfeld,
the US defence secretary, said the toppling of Saddam Hussein would
allow the Pentagon to reduce the American presence in the region."
"Islamic
Radicals On Campus" (Erick Stakelbeck, Front
Page Magazine, 2003/04/23)
A must-read essay on The Constitution of the Muslim Student's Association
of the U.S. and Canada (MSA): "The limits of the MSA's blind devotion
to heinous Islamic criminals will be further tested when the case of
Asan Akbar, the black Muslim Army sergeant who killed two and wounded
14 of his fellow U.S. soldiers when he hurled a grenade into a tent
in Kuwait during the Iraq War, comes to trial. Akbar grew up attending
a Saudi-funded mosque in South Central Los Angeles. He later moved on
to the University of California-Davis, where he spent much of his time
at the Davis Islamic Center, home to (surprise) the UC-Davis chapter
of the MSA. When Akbar, found cowering in a tent after his despicable
act, wailed, "You guys are coming into our countries and you're
going to rape our women and kill our children," he summarized the
MSA's feelings on the current Iraq War in a nutshell. ...
Created and funded by the Saudis but bred in the vast expanse of North
America, the MSA has engaged in every form of anti-Western behavior
imaginable. Whether marching side-by-side with communists in protest
of the U.S. government, supporting convicted murderers, preaching "Death
to Israel", funding terrorist activities or worshiping at the feet
of Osama bin Laden, the MSA National and its many campus chapters pose
an imminent threat not only to the schools they inhabit, but the United
States in general. With the war on terrorism escalating at home and
abroad, one can only hope that this volatile organization is exposed
for what it truly is - the sworn enemy of the United States, conducting
a jihad right here in our own backyard." (See also:
"Soda, pizza and the destruction
of America" (Aaron Klein, WorldNetDaily, 2003/03/18))
"PLO
gets more than SR 1.8 million from the popular committee for assisting
the Palestinian Mujahideen" (IMRA, 2003/04/22)
A dispatch from the Saudi Press Agency: "In line with the directives
of Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz, the governor of Riyadh region and head
of the popular committee for assisting the Palestinian Mujahideen, SR1,830,693
from the revenues of the popular committee for assisting the Palestinian
Mujahideen, were remitted today to the Palestine Liberation Organization
(PLO). Abdel-Rahim Mahmoud Jamous, the director general of the offices
of the popular committee for assisting the Palestinian Mujahideen in
the Kingdom, said this remittance constitutes the first installment
of the remittances of the popular committee to the PLO during this lunar
year."
"Don't
listen to the Arab elites, the Iraqis didn't and they're the ones cheering
today" (Amir Taheri, The Times, 2003/04/10)
"Much of the Arab media went hysterical about imaginary battles
in which resisting Iraqis supposedly inflicted massive losses on "the
invaders". They forecast a war that would last "for years",
if not "until the end of time".
Al-Ahram, the Egyptian government daily, promised that "the
heroic Iraqis, ready to fight to the last of their blood", would
turn their country into "a vast graveyard for Americas imperial
dreams. Many Arab newspapers imported their illusions from the
West. Throughout the war, the Saudi, Egyptian and Lebanese press syndicated
hundreds of articles from British and French anti-war newspapers. (The
Saudi Arab News, for example, ran up to ten articles from The
Independent each day.)
The headlines screamed "Americans slaughter civilians" and
"Thousands of Iraqis prepare for suicide missions". None of
that happened. The Iraqis proved to be wiser than some of their Arab
brethren had assumed. ...
These days the Arab media are full of articles about how the Arabs feel
humiliated by what has happened in Iraq, how they are frustrated, how
they hate America for having liberated the people of Iraq from their
oppressor, and how they hope that the Europeans, presumably led by Jacques
Chirac, will ride to the rescue to preserve a little bit of Saddams
legacy with the help of the United Nations.
Thank God, the peoples of Iraq, not deceived by Arab hyperbole, are
ignoring such nonsense."
"Arabs
react with dismay, disbelief to news of US troops in Baghdad"
(Donna Abu-Nasr, AP/Boston.com, 2003/04/07)
Also via Best
of the Web Today: "Arabs throughout the Middle East reacted
with dismay and disbelief Monday to television images of U.S. tanks
rolling through the heart of Baghdad, and some rushed to sign up for
a holy war against the U.S.-led forces. ...
Over a breakfast of croissant and coffee at a cafe, Saudi accounting
instructor Haitham al-Bawardi said he was having a hard time believing
the reports.
"How can we know this is for real and not just coalition propaganda?"
the 30-year-old said. "We had hoped Saddam would inflict as many
casualties on the invaders as possible to teach them a lesson and make
them think twice before striking another Arab country." ...
Another volunteer, Abdelfattah, 41, a worker in a regional city council,
said the reports were "all lies."
"It is a psychological war," said Abdelfattah. "If it
is true, then it is only a military strategy, to lure the American forces
into a trap." ...
Ali Oqla Orsan, head of the Arab Writers' Union, described the U.S.
incursion as a "propaganda parade," and said he hoped the
allied troops would face "total defeat."
"They are practicing terrorism against a sovereign country,"
said Orsan, a Syrian. 'If the allied forces occupy Iraq, it would signal
the beginning of a liberation war against the colonialists.'"
"With
Friends Like These" (Michael Isikoff and Mark
Hosenball, Newsweek, 2003/03/26)
"A surprise Perry Mason-type maneuver in an Idaho courtroom has
put the spotlight on an increasingly sensitive problem facing federal
prosecutors in the war on terror: a battalion of defense lawyers working
hand in glove with the Saudi Arabian government.
Ever since the 9-11 attacks, Newsweek has learned, the Saudi Embassy
in Washington has been providing top-flight defense lawyers free of
charge for any Saudi citizen detained as part of the Justice Departments
crackdown on suspected terrorists.
"That has been the policy since day one," said Muddassir H.
Siddiqui, the former chief counsel for the Saudi Embassy. He said he
personally arranged for defense lawyers for "hundreds" of
Saudi suspects detained by federal agents after the 9-11 attacks."
"Saudis
launch first al-Qaeda trial" (Magdi Abdelhadi,
BBC News, 2003/02/18)
"Saudi Arabian authorities have revealed that 90 Saudi nationals
are to stand trial accused of membership of the al-Qaeda network. This
would be the first prosecution in Saudi Arabia of alleged members of
Osama Bin Laden's organisation. The interior minister, Prince Nayef
Bin Abdulaziz, told the Saudi newspaper Okaz that more than 250 detainees
were still being investigated on similar charges. There was evidence
the 90 Saudis had joined al-Qaeda, the prince also said. ...
Prince Nayef accused what he described as foreign organisations of infiltrating
Saudi society and brain washing its youths.
Saudi authorities have repeatedly rejected accusations in American media
that the country's puritanical brand of religion, known as Wahhabi Islam,
is a breeding ground for Islamic militancy. Prince Nayef's remarks are
clearly an indication of the Saudi dilemma: the Saudi rulers are caught
between the need to do something about the threat of militant Islam
without openly acknowledging that it is a home-grown problem."
"Our
Friends the Saudis" (James Taranto, Best of
the Web Today, 2003/02/05)
"Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal ... has a chilling report on
Warith Deen Umar, a New York-based Wahhabi imam who until his retirement
in 2000 "helped run New York's growing Islamic prison program,
recruiting and training dozens of chaplains, and ministering to thousands
of inmates himself." Here are Umar's views on the Sept. 11 massacre:
"The hijackers should be honored as martyrs, he said. The U.S.
risks further terrorism attacks because it oppresses Muslims around
the world. "Without justice, there will be warfare, and it can
come to this country, too," he said. The natural candidates to
help press such an attack, in his view: African-Americans who embraced
Islam in prison."
And who's behind this? Read on:
'Imam Umar - born Wallace Gene Marks and later known as Wallace 10X
- twice has traveled to Saudi Arabia for worship and study at the expense
of the Saudi government and its affiliated charities, part of an extensive
program aimed at spreading Islam in U.S. prisons....'" (See
also: "Saudis Aided Subpoenaed Woman's Trip Out
of U.S." (Susan Schmidt, The Washington Post, 2003/02/05))
"Saudis
Aided Subpoenaed Woman's Trip Out of U.S." (Susan
Schmidt, The Washington Post, 2003/02/05)
"The Saudi embassy quietly provided the wife of a terror suspect
a passport and transit out of the United States in November, after she
was subpoenaed to testify before a federal grand jury in New York investigating
her husband's possible links to the al Qaeda terrorist network, diplomatic
and law enforcement sources said. ...
Maha Hafeez Marri and her five young children flew to Saudi Arabia on
Nov. 10, three days after law enforcement sources said federal prosecutors
had their last contact with a lawyer representing her. The FBI had confiscated
passports for Marri and her children soon after her husband was arrested
in Peoria, Ill., in late 2001.
Ali S. Marri, a native of Saudi Arabia and a citizen of Qatar, is charged
with lying to the FBI about phone calls he allegedly made in the months
after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks to a number in United Arab
Emirates that belonged to a suspected al Qaeda operative. The operative,
Mustafa Ahmed Hawsawi, allegedly received calls from several of the
Sept. 11 terrorists and managed a bank account they used."
"The
West, Christians and Jews in Saudi Arabian Schoolbooks" (The
American Jewish Committe. 2003/02/04)
A comprehensive analysis of "93 books taught in grades 1-10, mostly
from the years 1999-2002" in Saudia Arabian schools: "There
is no doubt that the Muslims' power irritates the infidels and spreads
envy in the hearts of the enemies of Islam - Christians, Jews and others
- so they plot against them, gather [their] force against them, harass
them and seize every opportunity in order to eliminate the Muslims.
Examples of this enmity are innumerable, beginning with the plot of
the Jews against the Messenger and the Muslims at the first appearance
of the light of Islam and ending with what is happening to Muslims today
- a malicious Crusader-Jewish alliance striving to eliminate Islam from
all the continents. Those massacres that were directed against the Muslim
people of Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Muslims of Burma and the Philippines,
and in Africa, are the greatest proof of the malice and hatred harbored
by the enemies of Islam to this religion.
Geography of the Muslim World, Grade 8, (1994) p. 32"
"'The
Shah Always Falls'" (Fredric Smoler, American
Heritage, from the February/March 2003 issue)
A must-read interview with Ralph Peters: "But I do believe the
last couple of centuries demonstrate that cultures that oppress women,
that don't have freedom of information, that don't value secular education,
that have one dominant religion that infects the state and has power
over the state, and whose basic unit of social organization is a clan,
tribe, or extended family are just not going to compete with the West
and especially with the United States. So I'm extremely pessimistic
about the old Islamic heartland.
I personally feel that we've made a grotesque mistake aligning ourselves
with the most oppressive of the Arabs, with the Arab world's Beverly
Hillbillies. Other Arabs built Damascus, Córdoba, Baghdad, Cairo.
The Saudis never built anything. The fact that they came into their
oil wealth was a disaster, not for us but for the Arab world, because
it gave these malevolent hicks raw economic power over the populations
of poor Islamic states, such as Egypt. The line about Al Qaeda that's
absolutely true is that Saudis supplied the money and Egyptians supplied
the brains. So Saudi money, spent to support their grotesquely repressive
version of one of the world's great religions, has been a disaster for
the Arab world." (See also: "Stability,
America's Enemy" (Ralph Peters, Parameters, from the Winter
2001-02 issue) and "Rolling Back
Radical Islam" (Ralph Peters, Parameters, from the Autumn 2002
issue))

"Saudi
Arabia, Negev"
(Traditional
women's costume in muslim countries)

"Saudi
Shopping, Saudi Arabia, Riyadh"
(Traditional
women's costume in muslim countries)
"Objects
and pariahs" (Diane West, The Washington Times,
2003/01/17)
West on the Saudi-American Exchange Program, including these comments
by American participants visiting Saudi-Arabia. Yes, this is the same
country where, less than a year ago, the religious police forced 15
girls to burn to death in a blazing school, "beating young girls
to prevent them from leaving the school because they were not wearing
the abaya." And of course you're "free from being looked at
as a sexual object" when veiled - you're free from being looked
at period. It could rather be argued that the "complete" veiling
of women in itself is the perfect symbol of a culture viewing women
as sexual objects in extremis: "'The portrayal in the Western
media and culture is that Muslim women, especially in Saudi Arabia,
are oppressed and subservient,' said one American participant. "Many
Americans believed that women here were forced to wear the traditional
abaya and veil. However, I have come to learn that the women here wear
the veil by choice." While a Saudi censor couldn't have said it
better, this quotation is attributed to Lorna Hadley, a student at Yale
University School of Public Health. And judging by the comments
of fellow student Amelia Shaw a fine choice wearing the veil
is: "I thought women, by wearing the veil, would be silenced, and
that symbolized not being allowed any verbal expression. However, when
I did wear it, I felt free from being looked at as a sexual object."
...
It's one thing to learn about Muslim dress which, despite all
the "understanding" this program has managed to promote, is
about as voluntary a choice for your average Saudi gal as her religion.
It's quite another when presumably liberty-loving American women become
apologists for a sartorial brand of servitude that, of course, is just
one oppressive fact of life for women living under Islamic Sharia law
as legal, professional and social nonentities. And another thing: A
woman may not look like a "sex object" when she dresses up
like a haystack, but she still looks like an object, period one
wholly devoid of a recognizable human shape." (See
also: "Why Feminism Is AWOL on Islam"
(Kay S. Hymowitz, City Journal, from the Winter 2003 issue), "Saudi
Women's Rights" (Charles Johnson, Little Green Footballs, 2003/01/12)and
"Saudi police face deaths criticism"
(Reuters/CNN.com, 2002/03/15))
"Saudi
Women's Rights" (Charles Johnson, Little Green
Footballs, 2003/01/12)
Johnson on an article in Arab News, about a "seminar entitled "The
Image of Muslim Women in the Western Media" ... organized by the
Information Center for the Womens Cultural Committee": "It's
always good for an inadvertent laugh or two when the Saudis try to defend
their misogynistic, backward treatment of women, and here's the latest
attempt: "Seminar on women focuses on Western double standard".
A little defensive, are we?: ... "Noura Adwan made the point that
the Western media makes judgments on the rights of Muslim women from
the perspective of Western feminism, and questioned its validity in
Muslim societies. "It is clear that religious codes of dress for
nuns who cover from head to foot is respected in the West while the
abaya worn by Muslim women is regarded as oppressive," she said."
She has a point; it is pretty shameful how our religious police beat
nuns whose habits are too loose..." (See also: "Seminar
on women focuses on Western double standard" (Intisar Al-Yamani,
Arab News, 2003/01/13)
"The
Scandal of U.S.-Saudi Relations" (Daniel Pipes,
National Interest/danielpipes.org, from the Winter 2002/03 issue)
Pipes on the "consistent pattern of deference to Saudi wishes"
by U.S. government agencies, with lots of outrageous examples and an
explanation - pre-emptive bribery: "The Saudi ambassador to the
United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan, helpfully hinted at an answer
in a statement boasting of his success cultivating powerful Americans.
"If the reputation then builds that the Saudis take care of friends
when they leave office", Bandar once observed, "you'd be surprised
how much better friends you have who are just coming into office."
This effective admission of bribery goes far to explain why the usual
laws, regulations and rights do not apply when Saudi Arabia is involved.
...
The heart of the problem is an all-too-human one, then: Americans in
positions of authority bend the rules and break with standard policy
out of personal greed. In this light, Hunter's report on the three main
U.S. government goals in Saudi Arabia begins to make sense: strengthen
the Saudi regime, cater to the Saud royal family, and facilitate U.S.
exports. ...
The massive pre-emptive bribing of American officials requires urgent
attention. Steps need to be taken to ensure that the Saudi revolving-door
syndrome documented here be made illegal."
"Briton
admits Saudi bomb murder" (Michael Theodolou
and Daniel McGrory, The Times, 2003/01/07)
"One of the seven Britons who have been in prison in Saudi Arabia
for more than two years on bombing charges has dramatically changed
his testimony and confessed to murder. The families of the other Britons
are said to be stunned by James Lee's admission and claim that it has
ruined any chance that the men have of proving their innocence. One
legal source said: "The Saudis take the view: 'One guilty, all
guilty.'" British diplomats in Riyadh said that they were astonished
by Mr Lee's written confession and his plea for clemency at the weekend
and are demanding urgent talks with the Saudi authorities over their
next move." (See also: "Saudi
bomb victim's torture ordeal - and Britain's silence" (Paul
Kelso, The Guardian, 2002/01/31))
"Saudis
gave Al Qaida $500 million and never stopped giving" (World
Tribune.com, 2003/01/05)
"Saudi Arabia has transferred $500 million to Al Qaida over the
past decade, according to a report prepared for the United Nations.
The report asserts that the Saudi funds represent the most important
source of financing for Al Qaida and that Riyad, pressured by leading
officials, has failed to stop the flow of money to Al Qaida in wake
of the Sept. 11, 2001 suicide attacks on New York and Washington."
"Questions
about Saudi crackdown" (Lisa Myers, NBC News,
2003/01/02)
"It's called the Empty Quarter, hundreds of miles of desert along
the Saudi border with Yemen thats now patrolled almost around
the clock by CIA drones searching for al-Qaida members. U.S. government
officials tell NBC News that scores of al-Qaida operatives are now cycling
back and forth between Yemen and Saudi Arabia, and that 30 to 50 al-Qaida
members are believed to be in Saudi Arabia at any one time. The claim
raises new questions about Saudi cooperation in the war on terror."
"Who's
Who in the House of Saud" (Aram Roston, The
New York Times Magazine, from the 2002/12/22 issue)
Short profiles of the key players in the House of Saudi:
"Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, 78
Best known as the minister of defense and aviation. According to the
rules of fraternal succession, he could be next in line to be king after
Prince Abdullah. He purchases the best weapons money can buy, including
U.S. tanks, fighter planes, missiles and Awacs (airborne warning and
control systems). Yet, in spite of billions spent, the Saudi military
is considered inadequate, and much of the gear reportedly sits abandoned.
Sultan, who has been dubbed Mr. 10 Percent, supposedly became extraordinarily
wealthy from kickbacks from Western businesses that handled multibillion-dollar
defense contracts."
"Preliminary
Overview. - Saudi Arabia's Education System: Curriculum, Spreading Saudi
Education to the World and the Official Saudi Position on Education
Policy" (Steven Stalinsky, MEMRI, 2002/12/20)
A report on Saudi Arabia's education system, with translated examples
from schoolbooks: "A textbook for 8th grade students explains why
Jews and Christians were cursed by Allah and turned into apes and pigs.Quoting
Surat Al-Maida, Verse 60, the lesson explains that Jews and Christians
have sinned by accepting polytheism and therefore incurred Allah's wrath.To
punish them, Allah has turned them into apes and pigs. ...
A schoolbook for 5th grade instructs the students: "The religions
which people follow on this earth are many, but the only true religion
is the religion of Islam. ... The whole world should convert to Islam
and leave its false religions lest their fate will be hell. ...
The students are then asked to mark "yes" or "no"
to the following questions:
*"The Islamic religion is the road to heaven
"
*'Other religions bestow eternal damnation on their adherent
'"
(Note: This sermon is an example of the religion of peace
in its Saudi version: "Sheikh Majed 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Firian recently
stated in the Suleiman Bin Muqiran mosque in Riyadh: 'Muslims must
educate their children to Jihad. This is the greatest benefit
of the situation: educating the children to Jihad and to hatred
of the Jews, the Christians, and the infidels; educating the children
to Jihad and to revival of the embers of Jihad in their
souls. This is what is needed now
'")
"Saudis
Behaving Badly" (Joel Mowbray, National Review,
2002/12/20)
"A new report submitted to the United Nations Security Council
explores the extensive ties between al Qaeda and the Saudi Arabia -
something that should raise a whole host of questions concerning the
future of U.S. relations with the House of Saud. ... Although charities
play an important role in funding terrorism, the report also details
how legitimate business enterprises and direct "contributions"
from wealthy individuals also prove essential to the al Qaeda network.
And the primary nexus for the banks, oil and construction companies,
and "businessmen" who infuse al Qaeda with the necessary cash
is an "ally" of the United States: Saudi Arabia. The report
states that al Qaeda received $300 - $500 million in funding from wealthy
bankers and businessmen, mostly from Saudi nationals or residents. ...
But the biggest expense to propagate the growth of radical Islam is
not paid for directly by al Qaeda, but by Saudi Arabia: the madrassas
that that churn out rabid young Islamic fundamentalists primed for jihad.
If nothing else, Saudi Arabia's continued insistence on fueling the
spread of Wahhabism raises perhaps the ultimate question about whether
the House of Saud is a friend or foe: 'How can a war against terrorism
succeed while the United States has excluded or preserved countries
such as Saudi Arabia, which tolerates the emergence of fundamentalism,
sometimes instrumentalized [its] goal, and today has become [its] sanctuary?'"
(See also the report: "Terrorism
Financing: Roots and trends of Saudi terrorism financing" (Jean-Charles
Brisard/National Review, 2002/12/19))
"Democracy
and Islam After September 11" (Stephen Schwartz,
The Weekly Standard, from the 2002/12/23 issue)
"I do not see September 11 as an act of protest by Muslims or Arabs
oppressed by the advance of Western democracy or the success of Israel.
I see it as an act of provocation by Saudi-based extremists, intended
to divert the younger, better-educated, middle-class strata of Saudi
society, and similar social elements elsewhere in the Muslim and Arab
worlds, from their growing demands for restoration of Islamic pluralism
and the right to live normal lives, in a normal country, in a world
at peace. ... By fostering the terrorism of Osama bin Laden, and then
by seeking to shift blame for the atrocity of September 11 to Israel,
the most reactionary elements in the Saudi ruling elite seek to quiet
the growing demands of the educated and entrepreneurial classes for
a new direction in society. This is an old phenomenon in the disintegration
of tyrannies. September 11 had little to do with U.S. power in the world,
and everything to do with bourgeois society knocking at the door of
Saudi Arabia; little to do with Israel and the Palestinians, and everything
to do with the recuperation of Islamic pluralism in Mecca and Medina."
"Who
is Prince Nayef?" (Bill Tierney, The Weekly
Standard, from the 2002/12/23 issue)
A profile of the "most powerful man in Saudi Arabia", the
interior minister Prince Nayef bin Abdul-Aziz: "Nayef is keenly
aware that the widespread sympathy in Saudi Arabia for Osama bin Laden
is a response not to bin Laden's personal charisma but to his jihadist
mission, explicitly framed as obedience to the true Islam. It is a danger
inadvertently sown by the regime itself, which long ago instituted the
incessant intoning of the Koran on state radio and television. Prince
Nayef, it seems, has decided to deal with this threat by riding the
jihadist wave. ... When the United States finally starts calling this
war what it is - a war against jihadist Islam - then clarity will dispel
the illusion that our relationship with the Saudis can ever go back
to what it was before September 11. The Saudis claim they are combating
terrorism. Can they also say they are combating jihad? In this country,
there are some old-school types who cling to their settled view of the
Middle East; the academic community (with rare exceptions) is still
sinking in the tar pit of postmodernism. But the Saudis have chosen
their course, a path they presumably see as consistent with the dictates
of the Koran. They will continue to play us for fools as long as they
can. It is high time we stopped cooperating. We could begin by taking
the measure of the man behind the throne." (See
also: "Saudi Minister of Interior,
Prince Nayef Ibn Abd Al-Aziz: 'Who Committed the Events of September
11
I Think They [the Zionists] are Behind these Events
'"
(MEMRI, Special Dispatch Series - No. 446, 2002/12/03))
"Initiatives
and Actions Taken by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to Combat Terrorism"
(The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia/The Wall Street Journal, 2002/12/12)
A report by the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia: "Since September
11, the government of Saudi Arabia has taken many actions to fight global
terrorism. Following are concrete examples of these actions drawn from
statements made by Saudi Arabian leaders, U.S. Administration officials,
news articles and press releases confirming the efforts on the war on
terrorism by the government of Saudi Arabia."
"What
Riyadh Buys" (Daniel Pipes, New York Post/danielpipes.org,
2002/12/11)
"A hint of the problem comes from none other than Prince Bandar
bin Sultan, the Saudi ambassador to the United States. The Washinton
Post reports that he boasted of his success at cultivating powerful
Americans: "If the reputation . . . builds that the Saudis take
care of friends when they leave office, you'd be surprised how much
better friends you have who are just coming into office." This
is precisely what happens. ... Ex-Washington hands paid handsomely by
the kingdom include such figures as Spiro T. Agnew, Jimmy Carter, Clark
Clifford, John B. Connally and William E. Simon. A Washington Post account
lists other former officials, including George H.W. Bush, who have found
the Saudi connection "lucrative." ... The heart of the problem
is an all-too-human one: Americans in official positions of authority
bend the rules, break with standard procedures and alter policies for
reasons of personal gain. The effect of the Saudis' massive pre-emptive
bribing is to render the executive branch quite incapable of dealing
with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in the farsighted and disinterested
manner that U.S. national interests require. That leaves Congress with
the urgent responsibility to fix things." (See also:
"Shilling for the House of Saud"
(Matt Welch, National Post/Matt Welch, 2002/08/24))
"Saudi
Stench" (Stephen Schwartz, FrontPageMagazine,
2002/12/09)
"Last week's federal raid of a Massachusetts software firm raises
many questions about U.S. security - not least about our "allies"
in Saudi Arabia. The firm, Ptech Inc., is said to have held millions
of dollars in contracts with clients including the White House, the
FBI, the U.S. Air Force, and the Internal Revenue Service. Yet investigators
believe top investor Yasin al-Qadi was a major financial backer of al
Qaeda. ... But there are significant holes in recent media coverage
of Al-Qadi. To begin with, Yasin al-Qadi is not a new figure in the
investigation of Saudi-backed terrorism. His name surfaced only weeks
after Sept. 11. ... On Oct. 14, 2001, Al-Qadi told the newspaper al-Sharq
al-Awsat, "I spoke to [Cheney] at length and we even became friends.
I also got to know former U.S. President Jimmy Carter." The interview
bore the headline "Yes, I Know Bin Laden and U.S. Vice President
is My Friend." At that time, Al-Qadi had already been identified
by U.S. officials as a terror financier. The fact that this criminal
sleazebag would attempt to besmirch the vice president's name does not
reflect on Cheney, but it does demonstrate that terrorist backers are
much more highly placed in Saudi society than many U.S. officials are
willing to admit." (See also: "Hotlink
to Terror?" (Brian Ross, ABC News, 2002/12/06))
"A
Wahhabism Problem" (Andrew G. Bostom, National
Review, 2002/12/06)
Bostom criticizes Stephen Schwartz for identifying "Wahhabism as
the source of all Islamic terror and injustice": "But the
reality is that, for nearly 1,400 years, across three continents, from
Portugal to India, non-Muslims have experienced the horrors of the institutionalized
jihad war ideology and its ugly corollary institution, dhimmitude. ...
Today, the Muslim intelligentsia focus almost exclusively on debatable
"human-rights violations" in the disputed territories of Gaza,
Judea, and Samaria, while ignoring the blatant and indisputable atrocities
committed by Muslims against non-Muslims throughout the world. ... There
is a dire need for some courageous, meaningful movement within Islam
that would completely renounce both dhimmitude and jihad against non-Muslims,
openly acknowledging the horrific devastation they have wrought for
nearly 1,400 years. Nothing short of an Islamic Reformation and Enlightenment
may be required, to acknowledge non-Muslims as fully equal human beings,
and not "infidels" or "dhimmis." It is absurd and
disingenuous for Schwartz to pretend that Islam's problems are centered
solely within Wahhabism."
"Saudis
rally neighbors against post-Saddam democracy" (World
Tribune.com, 2002/12/04)
"Saudi Arabia is working to form an Arab coalition to oppose any
U.S. drive to impose democracy on the Middle East. Arab diplomatic sources
said the kingdom has been consulting with Egypt, Syria and the Gulf
states regarding the ramifications of post-Saddam reforms in Iraq. The
sources said Saudi Arabia is concerned that it will be the next target
of the Bush administration. ... The London-based Al Quds Al Arabi daily
reported that Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al Faisal has been
touring Arab capitals and urging them to sign an agreement that would
pledge to resist any U.S. effort for regime change in the Arab world.
The newspaper said Riyad wants Arab League members to sign such a pledge
during their next summit. "No one can change the Saudi regime but
Allah," Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef Bin Abdul Aziz said."
"Saudi
diplomat named in suit" (David Wastell, Sunday
Telegraph/The Washington Times, 2002/12/02)
An American court has issued a summons against the next Saudi ambassador
to Britain, saying that in his previous job he helped fund Afghanistan's
Taliban regime while it sheltered Osama bin Laden. The summons has been
issued to Prince Turki al-Faisal, the former head of Saudi intelligence,
ordering him to respond to a compensation claim for more than $600 million
brought by the families of victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks.
The development will cast a shadow over the prince's appointment, which
will be announced in Riyadh within the next few days, after a six-week
delay. ... The prince, who courted bin Laden during the Soviet occupation
of Afghanistan and maintained close contacts with the Taliban regime,
was replaced as the Saudis' head of intelligence two weeks before the
September 11 attacks, after he had served almost 25 years in the post.
Earlier this year, he said bin Laden had become 'one of the most violent
and, I think, one of the cruelest killers in modern history.'"
"Charity
and Terror" (Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball,
Newsweek, from the 2002/12/09 issue)
More on the Saudi Money Trail: "As FBI agents in Chicago pursued
an investigation into alleged terrorist financing in 1998, they ran
across a curious money trail that soon led them into a diplomatic swamp.
A local chemical firm that was suspected of laundering money for Hamas,
the Palestinian terrorist group, had received a $1.2 million cash infusion
from the International Relief Organization, the U.S. branch of one of
the world's biggest Islamic charities. Determined to "follow the
money," they traced some of the charity's funding to a surprising
and sensitive source: the Saudi Embassy in Washington. The money flow
from the Saudis set off alarms in Washington. Investigators were told
by top Justice officials to move carefully, according to sources familiar
with the case. Some Justice higher-ups appeared worried that any inquiries
into the operations of the Saudi Embassy could jeopardize U.S.-Saudi
relations. "There was a concern about national security,"
said one investigator. The agents did as they were told. A court affidavit
spelling out $400,000 in money transfers to the organization was carefully
edited - to omit any reference to the Saudi cash. Instead, the document
referred blandly to funds from an unidentified "embassy of a foreign
government." The president of the chemical firm was later convicted
of fraud. But charges were never filed against the Saudi-financed charity.
Investigators complain they were actively discouraged by Justice Department
brass from pursuing the groups possible links to terrorism."
(See also: "The
Saudi Money Trail" (Michael Isikoff and Evan Thomas, Newsweek,
from the 2002/12/02 issue))
Copyright © Watch 2001-2006. Copyrights of quoted materials
belong to their respective owners.