| |

Archived
news and commentary: November 14 - 20, 2005
2005/11/14
- 2005/11/20
2005/11/07 - 2005/11/13
2005/10/31 - 2005/11/06
2005/10/24 - 2005/10/30
2005/10/17
- 2005/10/23
2005/10/10
- 2005/10/16
From 2001/09/11 -

Sunday,
November 20, 2005
News and
commentary:
"Al-Zarqawi
May Be Among Dead in Iraq Fight" (Robert H.
Reid, AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/20)
"BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. forces sealed off a house in the northern
city of Mosul where eight suspected al-Qaida members died in a gunfight
— some by their own hand to avoid capture. A U.S. official said
Sunday that efforts were under way to determine if terror leader Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi was among the dead. ...
In Washington, a U.S. official said the identities of the terror suspects
killed in the Saturday raid was unknown. Asked if they could include
al-Zarqawi, the official replied: "There are efforts under way
to determine if he was killed."
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity
of the information.
On Saturday, police Brig. Gen. Said Ahmed al-Jubouri said the raid was
launched after a tip that top al-Qaida operatives, possibly including
al-Zarqawi, were in the house in the northeastern part of the city.
During the intense gunbattle that followed, three insurgents detonated
explosives and killed themselves to avoid capture, Iraqi officials said.
Eleven Americans were wounded, the U.S. military said. Such intense
resistance often suggests an attempt to defend a high-value target."
"France
at the brink" (Alex Alexiev, The San Diego Union-Tribune,
2005/11/20)
"After two weeks of unrestrained violence across the country, France
imposed curfews and a state-of-emergency rule on 24 of its provinces.
The government certainly hopes that this wartime measure will quickly
scale down the riots and it may well do that. Yet history is more likely
to look back on this not as the end of an irrational burst of urban
violence, but as the first act in a protracted time of troubles for
France and Europe that could ultimately lead to the demise of European
civilization as we know it. ...
The first thing to be noted, much hand-wringing to the contrary, is
that none of the violence was either surprising or unexpected. Indeed,
it was the easily predictable denouement of the gradual transformation
over two decades of hundreds of Muslim enclaves into crime-ridden, self-isolated,
anti-societies that have de facto seceded from French society in virtually
every aspect except for continuing to depend economically on the welfare
state. With 70,000 cases of vandalism and arson, 29,000 cars burned,
pervasive drug trafficking and an epidemic of gang rapes in just the
current year, these ghettoes were an explosion waiting to happen long
before the recent events. None of this is new and numerous French authors
have described in detail the troubling evolution of what one recent
best-seller called "Lost Territories of the Republic." ...
It is probably true that the Islamists did not directly instigate the
riots. But radical Islam has everything to do with today's culture of
the Muslim enclaves. From its hatred of French secular society and its
norms, fanatic anti-Semitism and cult of violence to misogyny, self-isolation
from the "infidels" and admiration for extremists and terrorists,
the dominant values and attitudes among third generation French Muslims
are increasingly those of radical Islam. This is neither a coincidence
nor the result of a spontaneous process. Misguided government policies
in the socioeconomic and immigration realms have certainly contributed
in a major way by creating a climate of hopelessness and extreme alienation
in which the siren call of Islamism has flourished. But it is difficult
to envisage the kind of radicalization that has taken place without
three decades of organized subversion and infiltration of French Islam
by the fascist-like Wahhabi/Salafi ideology."
"Irresponsible
on Iraq" (The Washington Post, 2005/11/20)
"A serious congressional debate about Iraq is essential at a time
when public support for the mission is falling and the danger of failure
seems great. Aggressive challenges to the Bush administration's military
and political strategy -- even calls for an immediate withdrawal of
troops, such as that made by Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) on Thursday
-- must be part of that democratic discussion. Yet what we've mainly
seen during the past two weeks is a shameful exercise in demagoguery
and name-calling. ...
It sounds like the final days of a bitter, mud-slinging political campaign.
But what is at stake is not an election but a war in which American
soldiers are being killed and wounded almost every day and in which
one possible outcome is a major victory for the Islamic extremist movement
that carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Those losses won't be
stemmed, nor the dangers averted, by attack rhetoric or sound bites
that deliberately distort the facts. ...
What's needed is more talk about Iraq in 2005. Though there have been
successes -- including the staging of an election and a constitutional
referendum -- the country is in danger of splitting into pieces, and
the Bush administration has not done enough to head that threat off.
New elections in December could propel the country toward a political
accord that would undermine the insurgency. But reconstruction has foundered
and needs to be relaunched, with emphasis on supplying electricity and
jobs. Iraqi troops are improving but still are far from ready to fight
the counterinsurgency war on their own. If there is to be any chance
of that war being won, the United States will have to commit its own
forces to the fight for years, though perhaps not at current levels.
The alternative is to risk a defeat that would be devastating to U.S.
security. That's a hard truth to face: It can't be done amid a partisan
free-for-all."
"The
big cover-up" (Andrew Anthony, The Observer,
2005/11/20)
"Chowdhury is one of a growing number of Muslim women in Britain
who choose to wear the niqab, the veil that leaves only the eyes on
public view. Where once the sight of a fully hidden woman was restricted
to a few traditionalist communities, nowadays it is not unusual to see
the niqab on high streets throughout the major cities of England and
in a number of smaller towns. ...
The main aim of the niqab is to deter contact between women and men
who are not married or related. To approach an unknown woman and ask
about her clothing might, therefore, be seen as an act of provocation
or even aggression. I checked the etiquette on a Muslim website that
detailed the requirements of a woman wearing a niqab. 'Do not engage
in social conversation with persons of the opposite sex,' it instructed.
'This is simple, just don't do it. When a kaffir [infidel] of the opposite
sex asks you, "Did you have a good weekend", look down and
say nothing in return.'
I did try one couple. The husband was a tall, elegant man of Asian origin
and his wife, judging by her hands, which were all that was visible,
was Anglo-Saxon white. I told him about the situation in Maaseik and
he described the law as 'racist'. I then asked permission to speak to
his wife. He looked at me as if I were mad and referred me to the Central
Mosque. Would I be able to speak to a woman there? I asked. 'No, of
course not,' the man said. 'But there will be men there who will be
able to tell you why it is best for Muslim women to be covered.' His
wife remained silent."
"Machete
killings fuel Indonesia's religious hatred" (Dan
McDougall, The Observer, 2005/11/20)
"First light is the most captivating time of day as you cross the
vastness of the Indonesian archipelago.
Set against the blood-orange horizon, the echoing call of the muezzin
shakes you from your dreamlike state as men file to morning prayers
in bleary-eyed procession. Islanders arch their backs against heavy
carts laden with fresh jackfruit and laughing children in white uniforms
dawdle to school.
But in the central towns of the Indonesian island of Sulawesi events
of the past few weeks have destroyed the frivolity of the pupils' daily
journeys.
Three weeks ago, four cousins from the tightly-knit Christian community,
Theresia Morangke, 15, Alfita Poliwo, 17, Yarni Sambue, 17, and Noviana
Malewa, 15, were brutally attacked as they walked to the Central Sulawesi
Christian Church High School by men wearing black ski masks. Three of
the girls were beheaded. Noviana, the youngest, survived, despite appalling
machete wounds to her neck.
The headless bodies of her cousins were dumped beside a busy nearby
road. Two of the heads were found several kilometres away in the suburb
of Lege. The third, Theresia's, was left outside a recently built Christian
church in the village of Kasiguncu.
A week after the attack, a day after Alfita's funeral, two other Christian
girls, Ivon Maganti and Siti Nuraini, both 17, were shot by masked men
as they walked to a Girl Scouts' meeting. They and Noviana are still
critically ill in hospital. All six were Christians in a predominantly
Muslim community.
And yesterday police in Sulawesi said two young women had been attacked
on Friday by black-clad assailants on motorbikes armed with machetes."
(See also: "Christian
girls beheaded in grisly Indonesian attack" (AP/The Sydney
Morning Herald, 2005/10/29))

Saturday,
November 19, 2005
News and
commentary:
"49
Die in Iraq Blasts; Bombs Kill 5 GIs" (Chris
Tomlinson, AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/19)
"A suicide bomber detonated his car in a crowd of Shiite mourners
north of Baghdad on Saturday, killing at least 36 people and raising
the death toll in two days of attacks against Shiites to more than 120.
Five American soldiers died in roadside bombings.
Earlier Saturday, a car bomb exploded in a crowd of shoppers at an outdoor
market in a mostly Shiite neighborhood on the southeast edge of Baghdad,
killing 13 people and wounding about 20 others, police reported. Witnesses
said they saw a man park the car and walk away shortly before the blast.
In the north, U.S. and Iraqi forces raided a suspected al-Qaida hideout
in Mosul and at least seven insurgents died — three committing
suicide to avoid capture, Iraqi authorities said. Four Iraqi policemen
also were killed and 11 U.S. troops wounded, Iraqi and U.S. officials
said.
The second suicide car bomb exploded late in the afternoon as mourners
offered condolences to Raad Majid, head of the municipal council in
the village of Abu Saida, over the death of his uncle. Abu Saida is
near Baqouba, a religiously mixed city 35 miles northeast of Baghdad."
"Barricaded
in Paris" (Mireille Silcoff, National Post,
2005/11/19)
"French Jews are leaving the country in ever-growing numbers,
fleeing a wave of anti-Semitism. They are moving to Israel, the United
States, and increasingly, Montreal -- where the mostly English-speaking
Jewish community is preparing for its greatest demographic change in
decades. In the first of three stories, Mireille Silcoff examines the
fear in France that is driving the emigration.":
"PARIS - Romain Barthel greets me at the gates of the Lycee Diane
Benvenuti, a private secondary school in the leafy 16th arrondissement
of Paris. It's the day after Yom Kippur and the school, a Jewish one,
is closed. ...
Mr. Barthel explains the buddy system instituted at the Benvenuti school
for children both arriving and leaving the premises. The students must
travel in a pack and are not allowed to wear visible skullcaps or Stars
of David anywhere but inside the school. They are also discouraged from
dressing in a manner that Mr. Barthel calls "Shalala," meaning
that they asked to refrain from dressing in a style which in North American
parlance might be termed "Jappy."
"The Diesel jeans, the tight bomber jackets, these things can also
make them look like Jews," he says. "They must look more quiet
now, for safety."
Mr. Barthel is the father of two young children. Last year, his children's
school bus, belonging to a Jewish school in Epinay-sur-seine, a northern
suburb of Paris, was set on fire. "The bus was empty when it was
attacked, but still, nobody did anything about it, not the police, not
the government."
He says the Jews of France have increasingly felt as if they have had
to take safety into their own hands. "For us now, this means one
of two things: bunker in with bomb-proof glass, or leave."
Mr. Barthel and his family have chosen the latter, becoming part of
what could easily qualify as an exodus of Jews. In the past four years,
French-Jewish immigration to Israel has more than doubled." (Hat
tip: Rochi Ebner.)
"The
death of an easygoing culture" (Anthony Browne,
The Times, 2005/11/19)
"Islamist murders and threats have transformed the once-tolerant
Netherlands into a place of armed bodyguards and fear":
"Previously, only the Queen and the Prime Minister had police protection,
and ministers cycled to their ministries. Now, many politicians, writers
and artists are considered to be in such danger that they have permanent
armed guards and are driven around in bomb-proof armoured cars. The
Interior Ministry has set up a special unit assessing death threats
from Islamic extremists and providing protection squads. ...
At Leiden University law school, Professor Afshin Ellian, a refugee
from Iran who has called for reform of Islam, and even suggested that
comedians should make jokes about it, is hustled through the electronically
locked doors to his office by two bodyguards.
“In the Netherlands, terrorists want to threaten not only the
public, on the underground or on trains, but they also want to kill
public figures, such as artists, academics and politicians,” he
said. “It is not special in terms of Islam — in Iran it
is normal to kill people who criticise Islam, as in Egypt and Iraq.
It is legitimised by Islamic political theology, which says it is all
right to kill someone if they are an enemy of Allah. But this is happening
in Europe.” ...
Frank Bovenkerk, of the University of Utrecht, undertook a study for
the police that confirmed the rise in death threats across the country,
and their seriousness.
“They are under real threat — they would be killed without
protection,” he said. “It is to do with the sudden change
in political manners. We have a type of provocateur which is unprecedented
in the Netherlands. They claim it is about freedom of speech, but it
is about freedom of cursing,” he said.
Even if the would-be assassins are foiled by the intelligence services
and the protection squads, the death threats are already having some
success in silencing criticism. “People are very afraid of saying
things now,” Professor Ellian said. 'There is self-censorship.'"
"US
author lauds suicide bombers" (David Nason,
The Australian, 2005/11/19)
"One of the greatest living US writers has praised terrorists as
"very brave people" and used drug culture slang to describe
the "amazing high" suicide bombers must feel before blowing
themselves up.
Kurt Vonnegut, author of the 1969 anti-war classic Slaughterhouse Five,
made the provocative remarks during an interview in New York for his
new book, Man Without a Country, a collection of writings critical of
US President George W. Bush.
Vonnegut, 83, has been a strong opponent of Mr Bush and the US-led war
in Iraq, but until now has stopped short of defending terrorism.
But in discussing his views with The Weekend Australian, Vonnegut said
it was "sweet and honourable" to die for what you believe
in, and rejected the idea that terrorists were motivated by twisted
religious beliefs.
"They are dying for their own self-respect," he said. "It's
a terrible thing to deprive someone of their self-respect. It's like
your culture is nothing, your race is nothing, you're nothing."
Asked if he thought of terrorists as soldiers, Vonnegut, a decorated
World War II veteran, said: 'I regard them as very brave people, yes.'"
"Nothing
can prepare you for that moment when a suicide bomb is suddenly aimed
at you" (Catherine Philip, The Times, 2005/11/19)
"After reporting on last month’s bombs that killed 23
people in Bali and 62 in Delhi, and then last weekend’s suicide
bombs in Amman, our correspondent woke up yesterday as two trucks exploded
outside her Baghdad hotel":
"I walked back to the hotel reception courtyard where a crowd of
guards stood around looking at the severed foot of one of the bombers
lying by a tree. A hand and a penis lay yards away.
I sat down on a concrete bolster for a moment and thought about my friend
Marla, killed in a suicide bombing on the airport road in April along
with her beloved colleague Fais.
I thought about Nadia, the bereaved bride from the Amman hotel bombings
who had cried on my shoulder only a week before.
And the grieving relatives of the slain Diwali shoppers in Delhi, where
I live, wailing outside the hospital. Then I thought about the night
before in my hotel room when I watched the Bali bombers’ videotaped
statements before they blew themselves up at a beach restaurant where
I went the next day to watch the bereaved lay flowers. “When you
see this, God willing, I will be in Heaven,” the bomber said,
grinning.
I looked at the bomber’s foot still lying on the ground. No, I
thought to myself. If I believed in Hell, I’d hope that you were
there now."
"Iranians
admit receiving nuclear warhead blueprint from disgraced Pakistani expert"
(Ian Traynor, The Guardian , 2005/11/19)
"International suspicion of Iran's nuclear programme heightened
yesterday when it was revealed that Tehran had obtained a blueprint
showing how to build the core of a nuclear warhead.
Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told
diplomats that his inspectors had recently obtained documents from Tehran
showing that the Iranians had been given various instructions on processing
uranium hexafluoride gas and casting and enriching uranium. These had
been obtained via the black market in nuclear technology headed by the
disgraced Pakistani scientist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.
Informed diplomats said the blueprint for casting uranium was required
in making the core of a nuclear warhead, although that alone was not
enough for the manufacture of a weapon.
United Nations inspectors had long suspected that the Khan network had
helped Iran, but this was the first time the Iranians had come clean
on the issue. They told the inspectors they had not sought the information,
but that the Khan network had supplied the documents anyway.
This claim stretched credulity among diplomats and nuclear experts,
and reinforced their conviction that Tehran is determined to acquire
the capacity and knowhow for nuclear weapons."

Friday,
November 18, 2005
News and
commentary:

"Jordanians
hold an Arabic banner that reads 'Death for Zarqawi'..."
(Reuters, 2005/11/18)
"Jordanians hold an Arabic banner that reads 'Death for Zarqawi'
(the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab Zarqawi) during an anti-terrorism
rally in downtown Amman November 18, 2005."
"Al-Zarqawi
Tape Threatens Jordan's King" (Jamal Halaby,
AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/18)
Zarqawi II: "AMMAN, Jordan - An audiotape in the name of al-Qaida
in Iraq threatened on Friday to chop off King Abdullah II's head and
bomb more hotels and tourist sites. The speaker on the tape, identified
as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, also said the group's suicide bombers did not
intend to bomb a Jordanian wedding party at an Amman hotel last week,
killing about 30 people. ...
Al-Zarqawi insisted that the striking of the wedding party at the Radisson
SAS hotel was a "lie" and a "forgery" by Jordanian
security officials.
The Radisson bomber struck a hall where Israeli intelligence officials
were meeting at the time, al-Zarqawi claimed. But part of the roof fell
in on the wedding hall, either from the blast or even — he said
— from a separate bomb placed in the roof, though not by al-Qaida.
...
Radisson spokesman Bassam al-Bana denied al-Zarqawi's claims about an
intelligence meeting, telling The Associated Press, "There were
no meetings of Israelis there." ...
Earlier Friday, thousands of flag-waving Jordanians thronged downtown
Amman in the "March of the Nation," a noisy, emphatic demonstration
against the hotel attacks.
"Al-Zarqawi, you coward, what brought you here?" the angry
crowd shouted.
"Cease, cease, al-Zarqawi, you are a villain!" the throng
chanted. "Cease, Cease, you terrorist, you are a coward!"
Jordanian television reported that 100,000 people marched; however,
that estimate could not be independently verified. The size of the crowd
appeared to be much larger than protests in the days right after the
bombings."
"Zarqawi
Sends Top Aide to Die" (Richard Miniter, Human
Events Online, 2005/11/18)
Zarqawi I: "Sajida Mubarak Atrous al-Rishawi was not able to detonate
her bomb at the wedding party and fled with the guests as her husband
exploded himself. Now, she is in the custody of the GID, Jordan’s
intelligence agency. By all accounts, the interrogation is going slowly.
Still, enough information is emerging for us to draw some lessons for
the triple bombings in Amman, Jordan, on November 9.
Mrs. al-Rishawi’s family history reveals just how effective the
U.S. military has proven to be in eliminating insurgents. Jordanian
intelligence has learned that three of her brothers were killed by coalition
forces in Iraq. Her brother, Thamir al-Rashawi, a member al-Zarqawi’s
inner circle, was killed in April 2004 in Fallujah, when a missile fired
from a U.S. aircraft struck his pick-up truck. Jordanian Deputy Prime
Minister Marwan al-Mu’ashir described her brother, Thamir, as
“the emir [commander] of the Al-Anbar region [of the Iraqi insurgency]
in the Al-Qa’idah of Jihad Organization in the Land of Two Rivers.
He was the right hand of Abu-Mus’ab al-Zarqawi.” ...
Following these air strikes and captures, Zarqawi ordered the Amman
attacks. Was it a sign of desperation? Was he trying to regain the initiative
from weeks of reverses?
Another sign of desperation: Consider who Zarqawi sent to run the Amman
operation, Mrs. Al-Rishawi’s husband. He also a member of Zarqawi’s
inner circle. He is now dead. Why did Zarqawi send a top officer to
die? He has already lost so many. It suggests that either he’s
running short of suicide bombers (typically Saudi recruits) or he’s
running short of people he trusts. Either way, it’s a sign of
desperation."

"A
child embraces her father as they stand near a destroyed building..."
(Hadi Mizban, AP, 2005/11/18)
"A child embraces her father as they stand near a destroyed building
at the site where two suicide car bombers detonated vehicles in Baghdad,
Iraq, Friday, Nov. 18, 2005, in a residential district, and near a hotel
housing foreign journalists."
"Bombers
Kill 74 at Two Mosques in Iraq" (Chris Tomlinson,
AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/18)
Iraq II: "Suicide bombers killed 74 worshippers at two Shiite mosques
near the Iranian border Friday, while a pair of car bombs targeting
a Baghdad hotel housing Western journalists killed eight Iraqis.
The suicide attackers targeted the Sheik Murad mosque and the Khanaqin
Grand Mosque in Khanaqin, 90 miles northeast of Baghdad, as dozens of
people were attending Friday prayers, police said. The police command
said 74 people were killed and 75 wounded in the largely Kurdish town.
At sunset, dozens of people were still searching the rubble of the three-story
Khanaqin Grand Mosque. As the men dug, 12-year-old Sarkhel Akram collected
copies of the Quran, the Muslim holy book, then she kissed them and
put them away.
The suicide attacker walked into the mosque and detonated his explosives
in the middle of a group of people, said Ali Abdullah.
Omar Saleh, 73, said from his bed at Kalar hospital that he was bowing
in prayer when the bomb exploded.
"The roof fell on us and the place was filled with dead bodies,"
he said."
"Two
Car Bomb Blasts in Baghdad Kill Six" (AP/Yahoo!
News, 2005/11/18)
Iraq I: "Two car bombs exploded within seconds of each other near
a hotel in Baghdad that houses foreign journalists, the second attack
on international media in less than a month. At least six people were
killed and 43 wounded.
The double suicide bombing was also near an interior ministry building
at the center of a torture dispute, but officials at the scene believed
the Hamra hotel in the Jadriyah district was the target. ...
The blasts — less than a minute apart — echoed throughout
the city center, producing a towering cloud of smoke. They were followed
by gunfire.
The bombs brought down several residential buildings and gouged a large
crater in the road. Residents helped firefighters dig through debris
and pull victims from the rubble."
"You
don't have to be an amnesiac to be a Democrat, buddy, but it helps"
(Gerard Baker, The Times, 2005/11/18)
"Perhaps the biggest weapon in the arsenal of America’s critics
is carefully selective amnesia. Conveniently forgetting important historical
facts enables tactical amnesiacs to make claims about US policy that
seem to support their contention that the country’s government
is uniquely evil.
The latest evidence that George Bush is a war criminal has apparently
come this week with the acknowledgment that the US military used white
phosphorus (WP) on enemy positions in Fallujah. This is deemed an outrage,
something decent countries never do, yet more proof that the Bush-Cheney
cabal is sedulously destroying the very foundations of American civilisation.
The discovery that American soldiers refer to WP cavalierly as “shake
and bake” seems to have come as an additional shock to the easily
agitated sensibilities of the critics. Can you believe men can be so
callous as to refer to something so horrible in such a jocular fashion?
They must be Nazis.
In fact, WP is not a chemical weapon, not even banned by any treaty
to which the US is signatory. It has been used by the armed forces in
all countries in wars for decades. Indeed, if you look up the roll of
US Congressional Medal of Honour winners, you will discover that quite
a few received this highest military decoration precisely because they
used “shake and bake” to such successful effect.
The weapon’s purpose is to create a smokescreen that flushes the
enemy out of foxholes, so that the attacker can get a better chance
of shooting them or blowing them up with high explosives. I wait with
resigned anticipation for the reports of shocking new evidence that
the US has used “bullets” and “bombs” in its
attacks on the enemy."
"International
charicatures" (Diana West, The Washington Times,
2005/11/18)
"In Afghanistan, the editor of "Women's Rights" magazine
was convicted on "blasphemy" charges after a religious adviser
to President Hamid Karzai accused the editor of publishing two "un-Islamic"
articles: one criticizing the Islamic practice of punishing adultery
with 100 lashes; the other arguing that leaving Islam wasn't a crime.
Such charges may seem as far as the moon to anyone raised in a free-speech
society where adultery is a matter of private grief, not public beatings,
and where freedom of conscience is a founding liberty.
Speaking of liberty, wasn't it the Taliban, and not the democratically
elected Karzai government, who punished people for being "un-Islamic"?
Doesn't that new constitution Americans died to enable Afghans to write
guarantee protections and freedoms against such totalitarian practices?
Indeed, it does, but that same constitution also guarantees that no
law may contradict the law of Islam. And the law of Islam says no messing
with Islam. And that's not all: Since March 2004, a new media law signed
by President Karzai outlaws anything Islamically "insulting."
In other words, hello totalitarian practices, goodbye protections and
freedoms. And goodbye Ali Mohaqiq Nasab, the "blaspheming"
editor sentenced to two years in jail. By all accounts, this was getting
off easy: The prosecutor in the case was angling for a death sentence.
Has anyone heard ringing perorations from the White House on preserving
Mr. Nasab's free speech — let alone Mr. Nasab?" (See
also: "Journalist Convicted
of Blasphemy in Afghanistan" (Abdul Waheed Wafa and Carlotta
Gall, The New York Times, 2005/10/23))
"I
took Saddam's cash, admits French envoy" (Francis
Harris and David Rennie, The Daily Telegraph, 2005/11/18)
"One of France's most distinguished diplomats has confessed to
an investigating judge that he accepted oil allocations from Saddam
Hussein, it emerged yesterday.
Jean-Bernard Mérimée is thought to be the first senior
figure to admit his role in the oil-for-food scandal, a United Nations
humanitarian aid scheme hijacked by Saddam to buy influence.
The Frenchman, who holds the title "ambassador for life",
told authorities that he regretted taking payments amounting to $156,000
(then worth about £108,000) in 2002.
The money was used to renovate a holiday home he owned in southern Morocco.
At the time, Mr Mérimée was a special adviser to Kofi
Annan, the UN secretary general.
According to yesterday's Le Figaro, he told judge Philippe Courroye
during an interview on Oct 12: "I should not have done what I did.
I regret it."
But he also said that the payments were made in recompense for work
he had done on Iraq's behalf. "All trouble is worth a wage,"
he is reported to have said." (Hat tip: Captain
Ed.)
"Iran
in turmoil as president's purge deepens" (Simon
Tisdall and Ewen MacAskill, The Guardian, 2005/11/18)
"Iran is facing political paralysis as its newly elected president
purges government institutions, bringing accusations that he is undertaking
a coup d'état.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's clearout of his opponents began last month but
is more sweeping than previously understood and has reached almost every
branch of government, the Guardian has learned. Dozens of deputy ministers
have been sacked this month in several government departments, as well
the heads of the state insurance and privatisation organisations. Last
week, seven state bank presidents were dismissed in what an Iranian
source described as "a coup d'état". ...
There has been a series of rows about Mr Ahmadinejad's nominees to top
ministry jobs, including in the oil ministry. The stock market has fallen
30% since the new president took office, and there is growing criticism
of his failure to deliver on promises to create jobs and raise living
standards."
"Bin
Laden’s ruthless rival spreads tentacles of jihad across region"
(Richard Beeston et al., The Times, 2005/11/18)
"The world’s most feared terrorist mastermind, who has been
responsible for a two-year campaign of violence in Iraq, is planning
to turn his sights on moderate regimes in the Middle East, Europe and
Africa, where he intends to spread his ruthless brand of jihad.
An investigation by The Times into Abu Musab al- Zarqawi, the
head of al-Qaeda in Iraq, has revealed that the former petty criminal
from Jordan has built up a formidable terrorist network that stretches
from Britain to Afghanistan and covers many countries in between.
Once regarded as a brutal but relatively minor figure in the al-Qaeda
hierarchy, al-Zarqawi has outstripped his mentor, Osama bin Laden, who
has not been heard of for a year.
Al-Zarqawi commands more people, has access to greater funds and enjoys
growing support among young Muslims drawn to his slick internet websites,
which give lurid details of his latest attacks on “infidels”.
A recent study about Iraq’s insurgency by the Centre for Strategic
and International Studies in Washington estimated that 3,000 foreign
fighters had gone to Iraq to join the insurgency.
Now, battle-hardened, they form the vanguard of a “foreign legion”
ready to take the jihad to their homelands in what US intelligence officials
refer to as “bleed-out”.
The National Counterterrorism Centre in America believes that al-Zarqawi’s
network extends to 40 countries and that he has developed links with
24 militant groups worldwide."
"From
Tapes, a Chilling Voice of Islamic Radicalism in Europe" (Elaine
Sciolino, The New York Times, 2005/11/18)
"MILAN - Playing an Internet video one evening last year, an Egyptian
radical living in Milan reveled as the head of an American, Nicholas
Berg, was sawed off by his Iraqi captors.
"Go to hell, enemy of God!" shouted the man, Rabei Osman Sayed
Ahmed, as Mr. Berg's screams were broadcast. "Kill him! Kill him!
Yes, like that! Cut his throat properly. Cut his head off! If I had
been there, I would have burned him to make him already feel what hell
was like. Cut off his head! God is great! God is great!"
Yahia Ragheh, the Egyptian would-be suicide bomber sitting by Mr. Ahmed's
side, clearly felt uncomfortable.
"Isn't it a sin?" he asked.
"Who said that?" Mr. Ahmed shot back. "It is never a
sin!" He added: "We hope that even their parents will come
to the same end. Dogs, all of them, all of them. You simply need to
be convinced when you make the decision."
Unconvinced, Mr. Ragheh replied: "I think that it is a sin. I simply
think it is a sin."
The blunt exchange is contained in an 182-page official Italian police
report that has not been made public, but is widely available in court
circles and frames the judicial case against the two men. "The
Madrid attack was my project, and those who died as martyrs were my
dearest friends," Mr. Ahmed boasted in one intercepted conversation."

Thursday,
November 17, 2005
News and
commentary:

"Jenah
Benzanfour, 16, nests herself in the arms of her guardian..."
(Scheherezade Faramarzi, AP, 2005/11/17)
"Jenah Benzanfour, 16, nests herself in the arms of her guardian,
Manoubia Khalil, left, Monday Nov. 7, 2005, during an interview at her
home in a housing project of Saint-Denis, a suburb North of Paris. ...
Benzanfour was 11 when her mother threw her out of the house because
she was getting into trouble at school and with police for stealing
and threatening her teacher with a knife. At 13, she started selling
marijuana and Ecstasy for neighborhood thugs. At 14, she says, her uncle
raped her over a period of several months. At 15, she was a prostitute."
"Young
Female Immigrants in France at Risk" (Scheherezade
Faramarzi, AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/17)
"SAINT-DENIS, France - Fifteen-year-old Rawa risks verbal abuse
— or worse — every time she leaves her house wearing jeans.
Jenah was thrown out of the family home at 11, became a drug dealer
at 13, and was raped by a relative a year later.
If young men in France's poor housing projects — scenes of three
weeks of nightly arson and unrest — have it rough, girls often
have it worse. Not only do they suffer from racism, unemployment and
deprivation: They also endure daily harassment and even violence in
their own communities. ...
The plight of girls and women in the high-rise housing projects indicates
that while racial discrimination may keep immigrants and their offspring
on the margins of French society, that may not be the whole picture.
Some people in France's mostly Muslim North and Sub-Saharan African
immigrant communities have resisted accepting Western values and the
French way of life — making it harder for them to thrive. Polygamous
households, while uncommon, can also be a barrier to integration. ...
Physical violence — including gang rapes — has been widely
reported against girls and young women of North African origin.
Amara notes a pattern of unemployed immigrant fathers losing authority
to sons who bring in money by dealing drugs, stealing or who have adopted
radical Islam. Girls in such families are often exposed to violence
and exploitation or to religious repression, she said. ...
For her part, 15-year-old Rawa Khalil doesn't leave home after dark,
though daytime can be harrowing, too, with boys on the street calling
her "whore."
Her mother, Manoubia, 37, had been a victim of domestic violence at
the hands of her drug dealing ex-husband. But now she is treated with
contempt because she is no longer married.
"We have no father," Rawa said, 'no one to protect us.'"
(See also: "Violence
part of life for girls in French suburbs" (Kerstin Gehmlich,
Reuters, 2005/11/10))
"Dutch
MP to make gay Islam film" (BBC News, 2005/11/17)
"A Somali-born Dutch MP who collaborated on the film that led to
the murder of director Theo van Gogh has written a sequel, about Islam's
attitude to gays.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali received death threats after her work on Submission,
a film about Islam's treatment of women.
Van Gogh was shot and stabbed by a Muslim radical, Mohammed Bouyeri,
as he cycled through Amsterdam in 2004.
The film will use anonymous actors and carry no credits in an effort
to protect those involved in the project.
Ms Ali told Dutch media that she had co-written the script with Van
Gogh in the summer of 2004, months before he was killed last November.
"I examine the position of homosexuals in Islam in the film Submission
II," she told the De Volkskrant newspaper.
"In the movie, they are called Allah's creatures," she added.
The MP is an outspoken critic of Islamic values and describes herself
as a "lapsed" Muslim.
Mainstream Islamic thought treats Islam and homosexuality as incompatible,
and hostility to homosexuals is widespread in many parts of the Muslim
world."
"Iran
president's religious views arouse interest" (Paul
Hughes, Reuters, 2005/11/17)
"His call for the destruction of Israel may have grabbed headlines
abroad, but it is President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's devotion to a mystical
religious figure that is arousing greater interest inside Iran.
In a keynote speech on Wednesday to senior clerics, Ahmadinejad spoke
of his strong belief in the second coming of Shi'ite Muslims' "hidden"
12th Imam.
According to Shi'ite Muslim teaching, Abul-Qassem Mohammad, the 12th
leader whom Shi'ites consider descended from the Prophet Mohammed, disappeared
in 941 but will return at the end of time to lead an era of Islamic
justice.
"Our revolution's main mission is to pave the way for the reappearance
of the 12th Imam, the Mahdi," Ahmadinejad said in the speech to
Friday Prayers leaders from across the country.
"Therefore, Iran should become a powerful, developed and model
Islamic society."
"Today, we should define our economic, cultural and political policies
based on the policy of Imam Mahdi's return. We should avoid copying
the West's policies and systems," he added, newspapers and local
news agencies reported. ...
But what really has tongues wagging is the possibility that Ahmadinejad's
belief in the 12th Imam's return may be linked to the supposed growing
influence of a secretive society devoted to the Mahdi which was banned
in the early 1980s.
Founded in 1953 and used by the Shah of Iran to try to eradicate followers
of the Bahai faith, the Hojjatieh Society is governed by the conviction
that the 12th Imam's return will be hastened by the creation of chaos
on earth."
"What
sort of Frenchmen are they?" (Dror Mishani and
Aurelia Smotriez, Haaretz, 2005/11/17)
A must-read interview with Alain Finkielkraut on the rioting in France:
"Finkielkraut: "In France, they would like very much to reduce
these riots to their social dimension, to see them as a revolt of youths
from the suburbs against their situation, against the discrimination
they suffer from, against the unemployment. The problem is that most
of these youths are blacks or Arabs, with a Muslim identity. Look, in
France there are also other immigrants whose situation is difficult
- Chinese, Vietnamese, Portuguese - and they're not taking part in the
riots. Therefore, it is clear that this is a revolt with an ethno-religious
character. ...
To see them as a response to French racism is to be blind to a broader
hatred: the hatred for the West, which is deemed guilty of all crimes.
France is being exposed to this now." ...
"That's why these events sadden me so greatly; not so much because
they happened. After all, you'd have to be deaf and blind not to see
that they would happen. But because of the interpretations that have
accompanied them. These dealt a decisive blow to the France I loved.
And I've always said that life will become impossible for Jews in France
when Francophobia triumphs. And that's what will happen." ...
And I have been just horrified by these acts, which kept repeating themselves,
and horrified even more by the understanding with which they were received
in France. These people were treated like rebels, like revolutionaries.
This is the worst thing that could happen to my country. And I'm very
miserable because of it. Why? Because the only way to overcome it is
to make them feel ashamed. Shame is the starting point of ethics. But
instead of making them feel ashamed, we gave them legitimacy. They're
'interesting.' They're 'the wretched of the earth.'
'Imagine for a moment that they were whites, like in Rostock in Germany.
Right away, everyone would have said: 'Fascism won't be tolerated.'
When an Arab torches a school, it's rebellion. When a white guy does
it, it's fascism. I'm 'color blind.' Evil is evil, no matter what color
it is. And this evil, for the Jew that I am, is completely intolerable.'"
(Hat tip: Rochi Ebner.)
"Not
all Muslims want to integrate" (Bruce Bawer,
The Christian Science Monitor, 2005/11/17)
"For many Muslims in Europe, self-segregation has come naturally.
What's tragic is that European authorities have supported it.":
"Millions of "French Muslims" don't consider themselves
French. A government report leaked last March depicted an increasingly
two-track educational system: More and more Muslim students refuse to
sing, dance, participate in sports, sketch a face, or play an instrument.
They won't draw a right angle (it looks like part of the Christian cross).
They won't read Voltaire and Rousseau (too antireligion), Cyrano de
Bergerac (too racy), Madame Bovary (too pro-women), or Chrétien
de Troyes (too chrétien). One school has separate toilets for
"Muslims" and "Frenchmen"; another obeyed a Muslim
leader's call for separate locker rooms because "the circumcised
should not have to undress alongside the impure."
Many Muslims, wanting to enjoy Western prosperity but repelled by Western
ways, travel regularly back to their homelands. From Oslo, where I live,
there are more direct flights every week to Islamabad than to the US.
A recent Norwegian report noted that among young Norwegians of Pakistani
descent, family honor depends largely on "not being perceived as
Norwegian - as integrated." ...
In Britain, imams have pressed the government to designate part of Bradford
as being under Muslim law. In Belgium, Muslims in the Brussels neighborhood
of Sint-Jans-Molenbeek consider it to be under Islamic jurisdiction.
In Denmark, Muslim leaders have sought similar control over parts of
Copenhagen. In France, an official met with an imam at the edge of Roubaix's
Muslim district out of respect for his declaration that it was Islamic
territory. In many cities, police have stopped patrolling certain enclaves,
the authorities having effectively ceded control to local religious
leaders." (See also: "Leaving
No French Islamist Behind" (Olivier Guitta, The Weekly Standard/FrontPageMagazine,
2005/05/20) and "Allah Mode -
France's Islam problem" (Christopher Caldwell, The Weekly Standard,
from the 2002/07/15 issue))
"An
Incomplete Investigation: Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore 'Able Danger'?"
(Louis Freeh, The Wall Street Journal, 2005/11/17)
"Recent revelations from the military intelligence operation code-named
"Able Danger" have cast light on a missed opportunity that
could have potentially prevented 9/11. Specifically, Able Danger concluded
in February 2000 that military experts had identified Mohamed Atta by
name (and maybe photograph) as an al Qaeda agent operating in the U.S.
Subsequently, military officers assigned to Able Danger were prevented
from sharing this critical information with FBI agents, even though
appointments had been made to do so. Why?
There are other questions that need answers. Was Able Danger intelligence
provided to the 9/11 Commission prior to the finalization of its report,
and, if so, why was it not explored? In sum, what did the 9/11 commissioners
and their staff know about Able Danger and when did they know it?
The Able Danger intelligence, if confirmed, is undoubtedly the most
relevant fact of the entire post-9/11 inquiry. Even the most junior
investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta
in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many
times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11
Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically
significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the
failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises
serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts
prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant
itself."
"A
world without Israel" (Amnon Rubinstein, The
Jerusalem Post, 2005/11/17)
"Iran's president is not alone in wiping Israel off the map. A
group of academics and journalists are eradicating Israel - not with
nuclear weapons but with ink and paper.
On bookshelves in the West, you can see quite a number of books which
wipe Israel off the map, and it is almost impossible to find any book
- apart from Alan Dershowitz's writings - which refute their arguments.
These books are not attacking the occupation, but the very idea of a
Jewish state. Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, by former
BBC foreign correspondent Alan Hart, is a lengthy - 600 pages in the
first volume - diatribe against Zionism, the Balfour declaration and
the idea of a Jewish state in Palestine.
The title is taken from a motion discussed in a symposium organized
by London's Evening Standard, in which the mainly Jewish audience
voted for the motion. Hunt [sic], quite rightly, sees this debate and
vote as an event of historical significance and develops this thesis
into a two-volume treatise.
Jacqueline Rose's The Question of Zion and John Rose's Myths
of Zionism are two similar attacks against Zionism. Professor Tony
Judt of New York University also wiped Israel off the map in the New
York Review of Books in October 2003 by writing that "Israel
is an anachronism" and by proposing that it be replaced by a binational
state. ...
Their attacks against Zionism are compulsive, non-academic, full of
half-baked truths and barely disguised hysteria. Indeed, Israel-bashers
use a style which is very similar to the language used by anti-Semites:
Israel is inferior and should not enjoy the rights accorded to other
peoples. Formerly it was the Jewish person, now it is the Jewish state.
The Nazi refrain was "the Jews are our disaster;" now, the
Jewish state is being portrayed as the world's disaster." (Hat
tip: Melanie
Phillips.)
"Masked
militant threatens West" (Dean Yates and Achmad
Sukarsono, Reuters/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/17)
"A masked man believed to be one of Asia's most wanted militants
has warned Western countries, especially Australia, of more attacks
in a video found last week by Indonesian anti-terrorist police.
The video was broadcast on Indonesia's Metro TV on Thursday.
Vice President Jusuf Kalla, quoted by the Kompas newspaper, said he
believed the militant on the tape was Malaysian Noordin M. Top, a senior
operative of Jemaah Islamiah, a Southeast Asian group seen as the regional
arm of al Qaeda.
"We repeat that America, Australia, England and Italy are all our
enemies," said the militant, wearing a black balaclava and constantly
pointing his right finger in the air.
"We especially remind Australia that you, Downer and Howard, are
killing Australia, leading it into darkness and misfortune and mujahideen
terror," he said, referring to Australia's Prime Minister John
Howard and Foreign Minister Alexander Downer.
"Know that as long as you (all) continue to colonize the land of
Iraq and Afghanistan and intimidate Muslims then you too will feel our
intimidation and terror."
The video marks the first time militant threats have been made on tapes
found in the world's most populous Muslim nation, a practice common
among radicals in the Middle East."
Note:
Tom Gross, one of my favourite Middle
East commentators, has a new
website, with lots of very interesting readings. Hat tip: Melanie
Phillips.
Added
in archive:
"British MP George
Galloway at Damascus University: US Army Is Defeated in Iraq. US Will
Not Dare to Attack Syria. Bashar Al-Assad Is the Last Arab Leader and
Tony Blair Is A Slave of Slaves" (MEMRI TV, 2005/11/13)

Wednesday,
November 16, 2005
News and
commentary:
"Behind
the scenes, Saddam in fighting mood" (AFP/Yahoo!
News, 2005/11/16)
"Ousted Iraqi president Saddam Hussein has shown no remorse during
questioning and was beaten up when he hurled an obscenity at two of
Shiite Islam's holiest figures, a source close to the investigation
said.
The source, an Iraqi lawyer briefed by investigative judges in the Iraqi
High Tribunal, said Saddam was being questioned over the brutal suppression
of the Shiite uprising after Iraq's defeat in the 1991 Gulf War over
Kuwait.
He admitted helicopters were used to machine-gun civilians in the central
shine city of Karbala, saying that the armed opposition was targeted,
added the source not directly involved in the case but close to Iraq's
new leaders.
Asked about the shrines of the imams Hussein and Abbas that were targeted
by government forces seizing back control of Karbala, he pretended at
first not to know to whom the investigative judges were referring, the
lawyer told AFP.
"Who do you mean, those 'mnayeech' (ass-fuckers)?"
the lawyer quoted him as saying, provoking two of the court's clerks
taking notes to lunge at the fallen dictator and start pummeling him
with blows.
The 68-year-old former strongman, who used to surround himself with
layer upon layer of security during his quarter century at the helm
of Iraq, fought back before the chief judge intervened to restore order.
Saddam was left with a minor bruise to the forehead, the source said,
while his US guards posted outside the makeshift courthouse near Baghdad
international airport were amused and opted not to intervene."
"Fundamentalist
Group Doubles Egypt Seats" (Nadia Abou El-Magd,
AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/16)
CAIRO, Egypt - The Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's leading Islamic group,
more than doubled its legislative representation in runoff parliamentary
elections, according to initial results announced Wednesday.
The fundamentalist group won 34 seats in the first round, while the
ruling National Democratic Party won around 70 seats, after a runoff
vote Tuesday. The results were reported by the semiofficial Middle East
News Agency, quoting judges in counting stations.
The result was "a shock," said Abdel Gelil el-Sharnoubi, editor
of the Brotherhood's Web site. "I'm now praying to God to protect
us from future government wrath."
As a banned organization, the Brotherhood is not allowed to run as a
political party, but it fields candidates who stand as independents.
It had 15 members in the outgoing parliament. ...
The runoffs — which were marred by scattered violence and fraud
allegations — were called to decide the 133 seats in races in
which no candidate won more than half the vote in Nov. 9 polls, the
first round in the elections held over four weeks."
"Group
Think: It's not just France. It's Europe" (James
Forsyth, The New Republic, 2005/11/16)
"Europeans have spent the last four years hunting frantically for
a model of integration that works. The reason is simple: After September
11, as Americans looked outward for a solution to terrorism, Europeans
looked inward. They surveyed their own societies and saw a large number
of disaffected Muslims, many of them young and male. ...
And so, for European leaders, the question of how to integrate their
Muslim populations has taken on a special urgency. The problem is that
every time a country is thought to have devised a workable model, something
happens to prove that it hasn't. France is merely the latest European
nation to see its approach to integration unmasked as seriously flawed.
...
In Britain, a country that has rarely been happy with the idea of state-imposed
identity, the concept of letting the economy and time do the work seemed
the best approach -- especially as it had worked before. But this past
summer's bombings in London -- carried out by British citizens -- demonstrated
the model's shortcomings. Radical Islam had apparently been flourishing
in Britain, and its adherents had proven immune to liberal multiculturalism's
charms.
And so fearful Europeans turned to France, with its unyielding emphasis
on universal, enlightenment values. The liberal British magazine Prospect
argued that the London bombings had demonstrated the "limits of
the laissez-faire multiculturalism." The magazine placed great
stock in Britain's ability to develop "a liberal-integrationist
language -- the beginnings of a French-style ideology of common citizenship
-- with which to address the problem of ethnic enclaves." Of course,
French lessons on creating a tolerant and prosperous multicultural society
now seem far less attractive."
"Where
the WMDs Went" (FrontPageMagazine, 2005/11/16)
"Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Tierney, a
former military intelligence officer and Arabic speaker who worked at
Guantanamo Bay in 2002 and as a counter-infiltration operator in Baghdad
in 2004. He was also an inspector (1996-1998) for the United Nations
Special Commission (UNSCOM) for overseeing the elimination of weapons
of mass destruction and ballistic missiles in Iraq.":
"FP: Let’s talk a little bit more about
how the WMDs disappeared.
Tierney: In Iraq’s case, the lakes and rivers
were the toilet, and Syria was the back door. Even though there was
imagery showing an inordinate amount of traffic into Syria prior to
the inspections, and there were other indicators of government control
of commercial trucking that could be used to ship the weapons to Syria,
from the ICs point of view, if there is no positive evidence that the
movement occurred, it never happened. ...
Could the assessments of Iraq’s weapons program been off? I am
sure there were some marginal details that were incorrect, but on the
matter of whether Iraq had a program, the error was not with the pre-war
assessment, the error was with the weapons hunt.
I could speak at length about the problems with the weapons hunt. Mr.
Hanson has an excellent article in “The American Thinker,”
and Judith Miller, one of the few bright lights at the New York Times,
did an article on the problems with the weapons hunt that I can corroborate
from other sources. But if the Iraqi Survey Group had been manned by
a thousand James Bonds, and every prop was where it should have been,
I doubt the result would have been much different. The whole concept
of international arms inspections puts too much advantage with the inspected
country. Factor in the brutality used by the Baath Party, and it amounts
to a winning combination for our opponents.
I was shocked to learn recently that members of the Iraqi Survey Group
believed their Iraqi sources when they said they don’t fear a
return of the Baath Party. During my eight months of counterinfiltration
duty, we had 50 local Iraqis working on our post who were murdered for
collaborating."
"What
Paradise?" (Pierre Rehov, FrontPageMagazine,
2005/11/16)
"As a filmmaker of the new documentary Suicide Killers,
I will tell you that Hany Abu-Assad’s film Paradise Now
is an artistically fashioned fiction. A dangerous fiction about dangerous
people in a dangerous world. As fiction, his film stages good and bad
characters. And since the film is about the final days of life for two
suicide bombers, the killers automatically become the heroes. ...
Presented from the Palestinian point of view, moderate or otherwise,
suicide bombings are the result of occupation, oppression, lack of freedom,
and the desire for cultural pride. All of this reasoning is a lie. A
myth. I spent hours speaking with would-be suicide bombers in Israeli
jails and with their families in Gaza, Jordan, the West Bank and inside
Nablus, where Paradise Now was filmed. And I am sorry to tell
the Jury of the Amnesty International Award and the Best European Film
Blue Angel Award and whoever is ecstatic about the courage and the sacrifice
of these supposed heroes that they are just manipulated kids, victims
of a system and a culture, or, as Dr. Boaz Ganor from the Hertzliya
Center for Studies on Terrorism puts it, “stupid bombs and smart
bombs at the same time.” ...
Yes, suicide bombers are humans who draw our sympathy for the insidious
cycle of lies that pervade their lives. But as long as films like Paradise
Now perpetuate the myth that they are heroes standing up to a cruel
oppressor, the line for new suicide bombers will continue to grow longer.
This film promotes a lie that spells continued death and destruction
without the possibility of progress for the Palestinian culture and
its future generations. It celebrates the beauty of their selfless sacrifice,
shows them as having nothing to lose, and elevates what in real life
is senseless slaughter to noble action rewarded in heaven." (See
also, for example: "Palestinian
children learn at a young age..." (BBC News, 2005/11/09))
"Blowback"
(Fouad Ajami, The Wall Street Journal, 2005/11/16)
"'Iraqi Insurgent Blamed for Bombings in Jordan' was a headline
on the front page of the New York Times of Nov. 13: Not quite! For Abu
Musab al-Zarqawi, as his nom de guerre specifies, is a man
from the town of Zarqa, a stone's throw from Amman. The four Iraqis
who brought calamity to Jordan were in the nature of a return visit,
blowback from a campaign of terror and incitement, and a traffic of
jihadists that had sent deadly warriors of the faith from Jordan to
Iraq. ...
Once more, we are face to face here with the phenomenon of Arab denial,
an unwillingness on the part of broad segments of the peoples of Arab
lands to own up to the harvest of their own history, and to acknowledge
their own creations. We have seen this before, a cynical belief -- unstated
but powerful all the same -- that the terror should play out on foreign
soil and spare the populations that spawn it. How else can we explain
the anger of Jordanians that Zarqawi had struck his own birthplace?
In an unwritten pact with that prince of darkness, Zarqawi was to hit
other lands and spare his own. ...
An embarrassingly large number of Arabs, after 9/11, wanted schooling
-- and shopping -- in London, but hailed the terror that struck its
buses and transit. They were full of rage about Iraq's "suffering"
under American occupation after years of looking away from the mass
graves that littered the Iraqi landscape. Slowly, people in Arab lands
will have to see their history as something they shaped by themselves,
with their own hands. When this comes to pass, decent men and women
will not have to arrive at moral clarity only on the day terror comes
to their own doorstep." (See also: "Palestinians
Taste a Dose of Their Own Medicine" (Daniel Pipes, New York
Sun/danielpipes.org, 2005/11/15))
"Torture
Alleged at Ministry Site Outside Baghdad" (John
F. Burns, The New York Times, 2005/11/16)
"BAGHDAD, Iraq, Nov. 15 - Iraq's government said Tuesday that it
had ordered an urgent investigation of allegations that many of the
173 detainees American troops discovered over the weekend in the basement
of an Interior Ministry building in a Baghdad suburb had been tortured
by their Iraqi captors. A senior Iraqi official who visited the detainees
said two appeared paralyzed and others had some of the skin peeled off
their bodies by their abusers. ...
The discovery of what appeared to have been a secret torture center
created a new aura of crisis for American officials and Iraqi politicians
who hold power in the Shiite-led transitional government. For many Iraqis,
the episode carried heavy overtones of the brutality associated with
Saddam Hussein and his Sunni-dominated government.
Ominously, amid rising sectarianism here, Interior Ministry officials
reported that the abused detainees appeared to have been mostly Sunni
Arabs, and their abusers Shiite police officers loyal to the notorious
Badr Organization, a militia with close links to Iran."

Tuesday,
November 15, 2005
News and
commentary:
"Palestinians
Taste a Dose of Their Own Medicine" (Daniel
Pipes, New York Sun/danielpipes.org, 2005/11/15)
"A suicide bombing in Hadera, Israel, on October 26 that killed
five people inspired the usual Palestinian joy: some 3,000 people took
to the streets in celebration, chanting Allahu Akbar, calling
for more suicide attacks against Israelis, and congratulating the "martyr's"
family on the success of the attack.
But Palestinian Arabs were uncharacteristically morose after three explosions
went off on November 9, killing 57 persons and injuring hundreds, in
Amman, Jordan. That's because, for the very first time, they found themselves
the main victim of those same Islamist "martyrs."
The massacre at a wedding in the Radisson SAS hotel ballroom took the
lives of 17 family members attending the nuptials of what the London
Times called a Palestinian "golden couple, beloved of
their prominent Palestinian families and friends." The bombing
also killed four Palestinian Authority officials, notably Bashir Nafeh,
head of military intelligence on the West Bank.
After two decades of doling out this horror against Israelis, some of
whom were also attending festive events (a Passover dinner, a Bar Mitzvah),
Palestinians, who form a majority of the Jordanian population, unexpectedly
found themselves at the receiving end.
And, guess what: They did not like it.
The brother of a woman injured in the attack told a reporter, "My
sister, I love her. I love her to death, and if something happened to
her, I'd be really..." Choked, he stopped speaking and cried. Another
relative called the terrorists "vicious criminals." A third
cried out, 'Oh my God, oh my God. Is it possible that Arabs are killing
Arabs, Muslims killing Muslims?'" (See also: "Jordan
Attacks Claim 17 From One Family" (Mohammed Ballas, AP/Yahoo!
News, 2005/11/10))
"U.N.
Reinstates Official Fired in Scandal" (Nick
Wadhams, AP/The New York Times, 2005/11/15)
"UNITED NATIONS -- U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan reversed his
decision to fire a key official in the Iraq oil-for-food probe, the
United Nations said Tuesday, an embarrassing move as the world body
recovers from one of the worst scandals in its history.
Annan's decision, made known as he traveled in the Middle East, came
after an internal U.N. appeals panel exonerated Joseph Stephanides in
a ruling disclosed last week. The Joint Disciplinary Committee agreed
that he had been made a "sacrificial lamb" by U.N. officials
responding to public scrutiny that surrounded revelations of corruption
and mismanagement in the $64 billion operation.
The panel had recommended that the 60-year-old Stephanides, who was
scheduled to retire in September, be reinstated, issued a written apology,
and paid about $200,000 - about two years' back pay - for the emotional
suffering and damage to his reputation."
"Bicultural
Europe is doomed" (Mark Steyn, The Daily Telegraph,
2005/11/15)
Meanwhile, David
Aaronovitch writes that to warn about a "clash of cultures"
in Europe is a "self-fulfilling prophecy." So as
it slowly but surely gets worse, remember to blame Mark Steyn:
"But the Continent isn't multicultural so much as bicultural. There
are ageing native populations, and young Muslim populations, and that's
it: "two solitudes", as they say in my beloved Quebec. If
there's three, four or more cultures, you can all hold hands and sing
We are the World. But if there's just two - you and the other - that's
generally more fractious. Bicultural societies are among the least stable
in the world, especially once it's no longer quite clear who is the
majority and who is the minority - a situation that much of Europe is
fast approaching, as you can see by visiting any French, Austrian, Belgian
or Dutch maternity ward. ...
Even in relatively peaceful bicultural societies, politics becomes tribal:
loyalists vs nationalists in Northern Ireland, separatists vs federalists
in Quebec. Picture a French election circa 2020, 2025: the Islamic Republican
Coalition wins the most seats in the National Assembly. The Chiraquiste
crowd give a fatalistic shrug and Mr de Villepin starts including crowd-pleasing
suras from the Koran at his poetry recitals. But would Mr Le Pen or
(by then) his daughter take it so well? Or would the temptation to be
France's Col Rabuka prove too much? ...
In a democratic age, you can't buck demography - except through civil
war. The Yugoslavs figured that out. In the 30 years before the meltdown,
Bosnian Serbs had declined from 43 per cent to 31 per cent of the population,
while Bosnian Muslims had increased from 26 per cent to 44 per cent.
So Europe's present biculturalism makes disaster a certainty."
(See also: "It's
the latest disease: sensible people saying ridiculous things about Islam"
(David Aaronovitch, The Times, 2005/11/15))
"Egypt
campaigns against Danish newspaper cartoons" (Reuters,
2005/11/15)
It should perhaps be mentioned that Egypt is notorious for its never-ceasing
avalanche of anti-Semitic cartoons in its state-controlled media.
As far as I know, no heads have lost their positions because of that:
"CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt said on Monday it was leading a diplomatic
campaign against a Danish newspaper which published cartoons of Islam's
Prophet Mohammad.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit told reporters that the
publication, in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten, was "a scandal"
for which an apology was due.
He said the Egyptian government had been writing letters to leaders
around the world to muster support, including U.S. Secretary-General
Kofi Annan and the head of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation
in Europe.
"The aim is that this would lead at the end of the day to mutual
understanding, possibly to apology, an end to such acts and a stimulus
to Europe to correct its approaches," he said. ...
Asked what he thought the reaction would have been if a religion other
than Islam had been at the centre of the dispute in Denmark, Aboul Gheit
said: "Then we would see heads and officials lose their positions
and their responsibilities. But that's the way the world is today."
"The Arab and Muslim world must take a stand on this."
In the letters Egypt said the cartoons broke laws and violated international
resolutions and asked for the recipients to intervene, he said.
In answer to Egyptian and other Arab protests, the Danish government
said the publication took place in the context of the freedom to express
opinions, an official source said." (See also: "Muslims
march over cartoons of the Prophet" (Kate Connolly, The Daily
Telegraph, 2005/11/04))
"Women
defy odds in Afghan polls" (Tom Coghlan, The
Daily Telegraph, 2005/11/15)
"Female candidates have triumphed in Afghanistan's parliamentary
elections, with one bidding to become the new parliament's speaker.
After a delay in counting of more than a month, official results show
women secured seats ahead of male candidates in a quarter of the 34
provinces, while in one a woman was outright winner.
Before September's parliamentary vote, the first for 30 years, there
had been widespread predictions that, due to the conservatism of Afghan
society, women would only gain seats through a quota system which automatically
reserved 25 per cent of seats for them under the country's new constitution.
But women won seats in their own right and will take up 68 of the 249
in the lower house when it convenes later this month. ...
Malalai Joya, an outspoken critic of the warlords who has faced a number
of attempts on her life, won a resounding and symbolic second place
overall in the south-western province of Farah. Several women candidates
have indicated that they will attempt to form a women's party in the
new chamber, the Wolesi Jirga."

Monday,
November 14, 2005
News and
commentary:

"Palestinian
children learn at a young age..."
(BBC News, 2005/11/09)
Via LGF:
"In an admiring photo essay on the making of suicide bomber propaganda
film “Paradise Now,” the BBC reaches a new low in the caption
of a photo of Palestinian child abuse...
'Palestinian children learn at a young age about the struggle
for freedom. To some, the Palestinian martyrs
are heroes. Here a child poses for a photograph at a rally organised
by militants.'" [Note: BBC has now altered the caption.]
"No
debating their hatred: Some just see U.S., Israel as focus of all that’s
evil" (Clifford D. May, Boston Herald, 2005/11/14)
"We had gathered at the venerable University Philosophical Society
of Trinity College in Dublin to debate the resolution: “This house
believes that George W. Bush is a danger to world stability.”
But those tasked with defending the resolution were disinclined even
to discuss what they clearly considered gross understatement. Instead,
Patrick Cockburn, a British journalist, began by angrily accusing the
United States of embarking on an “old-fashioned imperial war”
in Iraq and beyond.
As for terrorism, that he dismissed as “something people believe
in like they believe in witchcraft. What does it mean?” ...
Tim Llewellyn, a former BBC Middle East bureau chief, announced: “George
Bush is a threat to world peace on so many levels we can’t begin
to discuss it.”
So he didn’t try. Instead, he turned to the topic that really
fires him up: Israel. Yasser Arafat, he said, had been correct to reject
the offer of Palestinian statehood made at Camp David in 2000 because
it was “a pro-Zionist type of approach.” It would have allowed
the Jewish state to survive. He found that a distasteful prospect.
I was not surprised. Before the debate, he’d noted that he had
heard a BBC host cut off a caller who wanted to discuss Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s threat to “wipe Israel off the map.”
The caller didn’t see what was so terrible about this idea. Llewellyn
lamented that there now seems to be a taboo against expressing such
opinions." (Hat tip: BackSpin.)
"Believe
It or Not" (Christopher Hitchens, Slate, 2005/11/14)
"Are you sure you want to keep saying we were fooled by Ahmad
Chalabi and the INC?":
"Let us suppose, then, that we can find a senator who voted for
the 1998 act to remove Saddam Hussein yet did not anticipate that it
might entail the use of force, and who later voted for the
2002 resolution and did not appreciate that the authorization of force
would entail the removal of Saddam Hussein! Would this senator kindly
stand up and take a bow? He or she embodies all the moral and intellectual
force of the anti-war movement. And don't be bashful, ladies and gentlemen
of the "shocked, shocked" faction, we already know
who you are.
It was, of course, the sinuous and dastardly forces of Ahmad Chalabi's
Iraqi National Congress who persuaded the entire Senate to take leave
of its senses in 1998. I know at least one of its two or three staffers,
who actually admits to having engaged in the plan. By the same alchemy
and hypnotism, the INC was able to manipulate the combined intelligence
services of Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, as well as the CIA,
the DIA, and the NSA, who between them employ perhaps 1.4 million people,
and who in the American case dispose of an intelligence budget of $44
billion, with only a handful of Iraqi defectors and an operating budget
of $320,000 per month. That's what you have to believe. ...
What a travesty this is. Not only do the liberal Democrats apparently
want their own congressional votes from 1998 and 2002 back. It sometimes
seems that they are actually nostalgic for the same period, when Saddam
Hussein was running Iraq, and there were no coalition soldiers to challenge
his rule, and when therefore by definition there was peace, and thus
things were more or less OK. Their current claim to have been fooled
or deceived makes them out, on their own account, to be highly dumb
and gullible. But as dumb and gullible as that?"
"Gangs
in Search of an Ideology" (Michael Radu, FrontPageMagazine,
2005/11/14)
Theory and practice. The official EU position seems to be that
there's no connection whatsoever between terrorism and the underlying
ideology. Taken to its logical conclusion this should mean that the
actions of Nazi Germany, for example, cannot be allowed in any way to
cast a shadow upon the ideology of Nazism [emphasis added]:
"The fundamental problems of the French banlieues are far from
unique. Romano Prodi, the leader of the Italian leftist opposition,
has already stated that similar developments in his country are a matter
of when, not if. Nor are the European elites' confusion and inability
to leave political correctness behind different from France's. The even
more serious problem is the "democratic deficit" within the
European Union. Brussels and many national elites show disregard, if
not contempt, for the anxieties of the majority, and for reality. A
recent EU Commission paper echoes the French Left's approach. As The
Guardian reports: "In an attempt to ensure that the vast majority
of peaceful Muslims are not portrayed as terrorist sympathizers, the
paper says: 'The commission believes there is no such thing as 'Islamic
terrorism,' nor 'Catholic', nor 'red' terrorism. . . . The fact
that some individuals unscrupulously attempt to justify their crimes
in the name of a religion or ideology cannot be allowed in any way .
. . to cast a shadow upon such a religion or ideology."
This, after the very same commission identified a "crisis of identity"
among young people born to immigrant parents as a key danger. "The
document describes radicalization as "a modern kind of dictatorship",
likens it to neo-Nazism or nationalism, and says the internet, university
campuses, and places of worship are tools of recruitment. It says second-generation
immigrants often feel little connection to their parents' country or
culture but may also encounter discrimination in European countries.
In short, the commission correctly identified the nature of the threat
-- Islamist terrorism -- but lacked the courage to name it. How very
Brussels!
France has long been seen, and still sees itself, as a model for Europe.
The present developments may well prove that Francophiles are right,
but not for the reasons they usually have in mind. Geography, size,
and its number of Muslims all make France a pivotal element in what
amounts to a cultural conflict of continental dimensions." (See
also: "Brussels
calls for media code to avoid aiding terrorists" (Nicholas
Watt and Leo Cendrowicz, The Guardian, 2005/09/21))
"Syrian
Parliament- speaker receive British MP George Galloway" (Champress,
2005/11/14)
As if on cue, Galloway proves Ralph Peter's
point: "Speaker of the People’s Assembly Dr. Mahmoud al-Abrash
on Sunday discussed with Member of the British House of Commons George
Galloway the current situation in the region and the Syrian firm principles
stance vis-à-vis the regional issues.
Mr. Galloway stressed that the speech delivered by President Bashar
al-Assad on Thursday was welcomed by all the honest around the world,
adding that his speech was that of a man who refuses subordination and
believes in independent decisions and full Arab rights.
The British parliamentarian stressed importance of activating the Syrian
and Arab media in confronting the Anti-Syrian flow of information as
well as the importance of dialogue in clarifying the Syrian stance."
(Hat tip: Harry's
Place. UPDATE: See also "British
MP George Galloway at Damascus University: US Army Is Defeated in Iraq.
US Will Not Dare to Attack Syria. Bashar Al-Assad Is the Last Arab Leader
and Tony Blair Is A Slave of Slaves" (MEMRI TV, 2005/11/13))
"Deadly
'Stability'" (Ralph Peters, New York Post, 2005/11/14)
"We've arrived at a bizarre point in our history when domestic
extremists on both right and left agree that ridding the world of dictators
is a bad idea.":
"The worst of the Cold Warriors are back, the "realists"
who tied the United States to the Shah of Iran, Saddam Hussein and the
Saudi royal bigots. They've risen from their historical graves to warn
against "instability" should we place too much pressure on
Syria's Baathist regime.
Wait a minute, Dr. Realpolitik: Bashar Assad and his family mafia murdered
Lebanon's prime minister. Then, forced to withdraw Syrian troops, they
began a bombing campaign to destabilize a country that voted for freedom.
The Assad regime harbors die-hards from Saddam's murder machine and
vigorously supports the Sunni-Arab insurgency in western Iraq.
Assad & Co. turn a blind eye to the use of Syrian territory to launch
international Islamist terrorists into Iraq.
Syria's Baathist thugs continue to support terrorists who attack Israeli
civilians and who are determined to prevent the rise of a rule-of-law
state among Palestinians.
Let me see if I have this right: The collapse of the Assad regime would
destabilize the Middle East? Exactly which stability are we talking
about?"

"A
woman walks past a primary school..."
(Remy Gabalda, AP, 2005/11/14)
"A woman walks past a primary school damaged when rioters rammed
a car into its gate then set the building on fire, in the southern city
of Toulouse, Monday, Nov 14, 2005."
"France
Set to Extend State of Emergency" (D'Arcy Doran,
AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/14)
"PARIS - The government approved a bill Monday to extend France's
state of emergency for three months, giving itself more policing tools
to stop the country's worst civil unrest since the 1960s.
Though violence has abated since breaking out 18 days ago, scattered
arson attacks continued early Monday, with youths setting schools and
cars ablaze.
President Jacques Chirac was to make his first presidential address
to the nation on the crisis later in the day.
The government's bill, if approved by parliament as expected, would
allow the current 12-day state of emergency to be prolonged until mid-February
if needed. The emergency measures empower regions to impose curfews
on minors, conduct house searches and take other steps to prevent unrest.
Chirac told his Cabinet that the state of emergency was "necessary
to give security forces all the means they need to restore calm definitively."
"It is a measure of protection and precaution," he said, stressing
that the plan was temporary and that regional officials would use it
"only where it is strictly necessary."
About 40 French towns, including France's third-largest city, Lyon,
have used the measure to impose curfews for minors."
"Saudi
jailed for discussing the Bible" (Reuters/The
Washington Times, 2005/11/14)
"RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (Reuters) -- A court sentenced a teacher
to 40 months in prison and 750 lashes for "mocking religion"
after he discussed the Bible and praised Jews, a Saudi newspaper reported
yesterday.
Al-Madina newspaper said secondary-school teacher Mohammad al-Harbi,
who will be flogged in public, was taken to court by his colleagues
and students.
He was charged with promoting a "dubious ideology, mocking religion,
saying the Jews were right, discussing the Gospel and preventing students
from leaving class to wash for prayer," the newspaper said.
Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Islam, strictly upholds the austere
Wahhabi school of Islam and bases its constitution on the Koran and
the sayings of the prophet Muhammad. Public practice of any other religion
is banned."
"Fight
over cinemas kills at least 12" (Mohamed Ali
Bile, Reuters/The Australian, 2005/11/14)
"Heavy fighting apparently sparked by an Islamic militia's moves
to close cinemas and video stores in the lawless Somali capital has
killed at least 12 people and wounded more than 21.
Clashes between gunmen loyal to Mogadishu's Islamic courts and local
militia defending the densely populated Yaqshid district began yesterday
and flared again today.
"The Islamic courts' militia are trying to close all entertainment
centres of the district," one local resident Ahmed Dhuhulow said.
Three people died yesterday and another nine today in clashes that caused
inhabitants to flee the area and shops to close, witnesses said.
Heavy firing could be heard from all over Mogadishu, home to one million
of Somalia's 10 million people and scene of frequent street battles
during 14 years of anarchy. ...
Leaders of Mogadishu's influential Islamic courts oppose Western and
Indian films which they say promote immorality in the mainly Muslim
nation."
"Christians
under siege in Pakistan after riot" (Isambard
Wilkinson, The Daily Telegraph, 2005/11/14)
"The Christians of Sangla Hill in Pakistan were a community under
siege last night after a Muslim mob rampaged through the town, burning
churches and a Roman Catholic compound.
Father Samson Dilawar, parish priest of the Roman Catholic Church of
Nazooli-i-Rooh, the Blessing of the Sacred Spirit, was still dressed
in the cassock in which he fled when the mob knocked down the gate to
the church compound on Saturday.
"I heard the mullahs had been telling people over loudspeakers,
'We are guardians of the Koran and it is our foremost duty to teach
a lesson to those kafirs'," he said. "Then they came to my
door." ...
They shouted insults at the Christians, calling them "kafirs"
and "chucha", the abusive term for non-Muslims and untouchables,
and "kuta", which means dogs. ...
His residence was doused in chemicals and set alight, gutting the building
and destroying century-old documents.
In the same compound, St Anthony's Primary School, which has 1,500 Muslim
and Christian pupils, was ransacked and burnt.
The same treatment was meted out to the church, convent, boarding house
and medical centre. The feet were snapped off statues of Jesus, metal
crucifixes were buckled and nuns' habits torched." (Hat
tip: Dhimmi
Watch. See also: "Anti-Christian
rampage features 2,000 Muslims" (WorldNetDaily, 2005/11/13))
"Nuclear
Link Alleged in Australia Arrests" (Meraiah
Foley, AP/Yahoo! News, 2005/11/14)
"SYDNEY, Australia - Police believe a nuclear reactor in southern
Sydney was a possible target for an Islamic terror cell there, according
to details of an Australian counterterror investigation released Monday.
Police previously stopped and questioned three recently arrested Sydney
terror suspects near Australia's only nuclear reactor in December last
year, according to an outline of police allegations made public Monday.
The document also outlined what it said were plans by the men to stockpile
chemicals for making explosives and that they "obtained extremist
advice and guidance" from a firebrand cleric arrested along with
them.
The three men stopped near the nuclear reactor were among 18 terror
suspects arrested in Sydney and Melbourne last week and accused of plotting
to carry out a "catastrophic" attack in Australia. The police
document recounted the December incident under the heading, 'Possible
targets for terrorist attack.'"
Added
in archive:
"Go home in the name
of Allah, order imams with megaphones" (Charles Bremner,
The Times, 2005/11/08)
"Youths' poverty, despair
fuel violent unrest in France" (Colin Nickerson, The
Boston Globe, 2005/11/06)
"16
Muslims reportedly rape Christian girl" (Jeremy
Reynalds, WorldNetDaily, 2005/10/02)
See
the archive for earlier news and commentary.
Copyright © Watch 2001-2006.
Copyrights of quoted materials belong to their respective owners.
|
|


"When
people accept futility and the absurd as normal, the culture is decadent.
The term is not a slur; it is a technical label."
Jacques
Barzun

Articles
of the week

|