Archived news and commentary: March 11 - 17, 2002

2002/03/25 - 2002/03/31
2002/03/18 - 2002/03/24
2002/03/11 - 2002/03/17
2002/03/04 - 2002/03/10
2002/02/25 - 2002/03/03
2002/02/18 - 2002/02/24
2002/02/11 - 2002/02/17
2002/02/04 - 2002/02/10
2002/01/28 - 2002/02/03
2002/01/21 - 2002/01/27
2002/01/14 - 2002/01/20
2002/01/07 - 2002/01/13
2002/01/01 - 2002/01/06

Sunday, March 17, 2002

News and commentary:

"Immoral equivalency" (Michael Rubin, The Jerusalem Post, 2002/03/17)
"The moral-equivalency labeling of both sides as equally at fault is increasingly in vogue at the UN, in European capitals, and at the US State Department. ... Rather than promote peace, moral equivalency encourages war. When warring parties' positions are automatically morally equalized, then both sides might as well take more extreme stances. Why should Arafat negotiate in good faith, if suicide bombings can legitimize his call to make final agreements the starting point for new negotiation? ... While it sounds noble, the rhetoric of moral equivalency is not only empty, but also destructive. To equate blame is to deny responsibility. And to deny responsibility is to remove disincentive for violence. The quickest way to end terrorism is not to spout platitudes, but rather to create consequences."

"The Jihad Files: Al Qaeda's Grocery Lists and Manuals of Killing" (David Rohde & C.J. Chivers, The New York Times, 2002/03/17)
The first article in a series examining documents left behind in Afghanistan by Islamic militants: "Like any army, though admittedly with its own religious and political vernacular, the jihadi network was constantly indoctrinating and building esprit de corps. A quick summary of the "Goals and Objectives of Jihad" was found in a Qaeda house: '1. Establishing the rule of God on earth. 2. Attaining martyrdom in the cause of God. 3. Purification of the ranks of Islam from the elements of depravity.'" (See also: "The Al Qaeda documents" and "Letter from the front: Victory or Martyrdom. 'So How Could They Retreat So Easily?'": "He began to throw them at the enemy until one of the enemy was able to hit Omar in the head with a close-range shot. ... He went floating in the garden of Eden. Wearing the garb and belt of eternal life. He picks the choicest fruit of the gardens and bird-like. He sings his thanks to a Lord who has given him rest. He had in this life been a prisoner. Now God - may He be exalted - has freed him.")

"Only a wall will keep them from each other's throats" (Martin van Creveld, The Daily Telegraph, 2002/03/17)
"In essence, the problem facing armed forces in dealing with this kind of war is always the same. He who fights against the weak - and the Palestinians with their home-made mortars and rockets are weak indeed - will become weak; he who behaves like a coward - and fighting the weak is cowardly by definition - will become one. ... Therefore Israel's one salvation is to get out and build a wall - a wall so high that not even the birds can fly over it - and permit the Palestinians to establish their state on the other side of it, as the Saudi peace plan suggests and this week's Security Council Resolution demands."

"Five dead in Pakistan church blast" (BBC News, 2002/03/17)
"At least five people have died in a grenade attack on a Protestant church in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad. The church, inside the city's heavily guarded diplomatic enclave and not far from the United States embassy, was crowded with Sunday morning worshippers. ... Islamabad police chief Nasir Durrani told reporters that 45 people had been injured. The condition of several is said to be critical. ... Police say at least two men burst into the church and tossed six grenades at the congregation as prayer services were under way. Three exploded, but the others failed to detonate."

"'Most wanted' Al-Qaeda man held in Africa" (Jonathan Leake & Jack Grimston, The Sunday Times, 2002/03/17)
"A terrorist named by President George W Bush as one of the 22 most dangerous men in the world has been captured in Africa, according to US intelligence sources. A senior militant from Osama Bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network is being held at a high-security prison in the capital Khartoum. He was named as "Abu Anas", thought by some officials to be a Libyan terrorist who once claimed asylum in Britain and has a $25m (£17.5m) reward on his head. Abu Anas Al-Liby was accused of plotting the American embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania which killed 224 people. If his arrest is confirmed it would make him the first from Bush's FBI list of "most-wanted terrorists" to be caught alive."

Saturday, March 16, 2002

News and commentary:

"The Suicide of the Palestinians" (David Gelernter, The Weekly Standard, from the 2002/03/25 issue)
"We ought to face squarely the origins of the Palestinian descent into barbarism. In July 2000, Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak made a peace offer that stunned Israel and the world: Israel would re-divide Jerusalem - would turn over large pieces of its ancient capital to the same people who had destroyed its synagogues, desecrated its cemeteries, and banned Jews from entering when they last ran the show. Arafat rejected the offer. Then in September 2000 the new wave of murderous violence began, supposedly triggered by Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount. In short, the Palestinian response to Israel's generous peace offer was, "Drop dead." ... The "lesson of appeasement" is not that appeasement is futile. Appeasement is not futile, it is dangerous."

"Why it is right to join America’s fight" (Rosemary Righter, The Spectator, from the 2002/03/16 issue)
"It is not the least of the oddities of this open-ended confrontation that American intervention is courted, not denounced, in al-Qa’eda territory, in Yemen and even in Sudan; it is to the salons and newsrooms of Paris, Brussels and Berlin, and to places such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London, that you must go to hear these words: ‘What is the threat? It is the United States.’ ... The rise in anti-Americanism — and, to a lesser extent, anti-Israeli prejudice — may be a chattering-class phenomenon; but it risks distorting the political prism through which Britain’s national interest is perceived. ... Britain’s interest is not always identical with America’s. But it is now. Blair should wear the badge of loyalty with pride."

Friday, March 15, 2002

News and commentary:

"Questions" (Victor Davis Hanson, National Review 2002/03/15)
"Would the world be angry if a Jewish terrorist forced a captured Muslim to admit to his race and faith as he executed and beheaded him on film? ... If 19 Americans incinerated 3,000 Muslims in Mecca or Medina, and blew up 20 acres in either of those cities with a two-kiloton explosion, would the Saudis or the Egyptians a few weeks later politely listen to admonitions from the American government about their incorrect Islamic policies in the Middle East?"

"Saudi police face deaths criticism" (Reuters/CNN.com, 2002/03/15)
"Saudi media, in a rare criticism of the kingdom's powerful religious police, have accused the force of hampering efforts to rescue 15 girls who died inside a blazing school. ... The al-Eqtisadiah daily said firemen scuffled with members of the religious police, also known as "mutaween," after they tried to keep the girls inside the burning building because they did not wear head scarves and abayas (black robes) as required by the kingdom's strict interpretation of Islam. The English-language Saudi Gazette, in a front-page report on Thursday, quoted witnesses as saying that members of the police, known as the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, had stopped men who tried to help the girls warning "it is a sinful to approach them." One civil defence officer told al-Eqtisadiah he saw three members of the religious police "beating young girls to prevent them from leaving the school because they were not wearing the abaya."

"Can There Be a Decent Left?" (Michael Walzer, Dissent magazine, from the Spring 2002 issue)
"But the war was primarily neither of these things; it was a preventive war, designed to make it impossible to train terrorists in Afghanistan and to plan and organize attacks like that of September 11. And that war was never really accepted, in wide sections of the left, as either just or necessary. Recall the standard arguments against it: that we should have turned to the UN, that we had to prove the guilt of al-Qaeda and the Taliban and then organize international trials, and that the war, if it was fought at all, had to be fought without endangering civilians. The last point was intended to make fighting impossible. ... The truth is that most leftists were not committed to having a coherent view about things like that; they were committed to opposing the war, and they were prepared to oppose it without regard to its causes or character and without any visible concern about preventing future terrorist attacks."

"Quiet, Please, on The Western Front" (Peggy Noonan, The Wall Street Journal, 2002/03/15)
"'Let's Nuke Em All!' Britain's Daily Mail headlined this week. The story was about the U.S. government review of its nuclear capabilities. Someone - Mary McGrory wondered in her column if it was "doomsday planners" or "a subversive showoff" - leaked the news that the U.S. may be re-evaluating its nuclear posture, strategy and potential targets with an eye to breaking the taboo on tactical nuclear weapons. The New York Times, one of the great newspapers of the world and received by some in the world as a voice of the West, ran an editorial in which it likened America to a "rogue state." A columnist in the Boston Globe said President Bush is "as frightening as al Qaeda." ... Why are we being so careless and colorful, so offhand, at a time when what faces us is so somber? Maybe we in the media are not thinking of the impression we make en masse, all together, on the world."

Thursday, March 14, 2002

News and commentary:

'"Hunt the Boeing' Answers" (Paul Boutin & Patrick Di Justo, Paul Boutin Weblogger, 2002/03/14)
A thourogh debunking of the allegation that no Boeing aircraft was involved in the terror attack on Pentagon on September 11: "As lifelong propellerheads who firmly believe in asking questions, we found Hunt the Boeing an engaging puzzle, despite its tragic subject matter, but one full of obvious errors and misleading questions. Since many of our friends continue to ask us if we've seen the site, we decided to document our answers to it, which we wrote separately. As might be expected, Patrick focused on the math and science (you may remember his widely circulated napkin math on the WTC attack), while Paul picked apart the wording of the questions." (See also: "Hunt the Boeing! And test your perceptions!" (Asile.org))

"'It's Not Helpful What the Israelis Have Recently Done'" (The Washington Post, 2002/03/14)
"Q: Mr. President, do you agree with Kofi Annan that Israel must end the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands? And how is the Israeli offensive going to complicate General Zinni's mission?
Bush: It is important to create conditions for peace in the Middle East. Now, our government has provided a security plan that has been agreed to by both the Israelis and the Palestinians called the Tenet plan. And George Mitchell did good work providing a pathway for a political settlement, once conditions warranted. Frankly, it's not helpful what the Israelis have recently done in order to create conditions for peace. I understand someone trying to defend themselves and to fight terror. But the recent actions aren't helpful."

"Bush versus Israel" (Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish, 2002/03/14)
"So Arafat wins, after all. He quit Camp David because he believed he could get a better deal by ramping up the violence. He is now one of many terrorist leaders waging a sustained war on Israel, a war that Israel, even unhindered, would have a hard time winning. He has now spectacularly proven his point that terrorism works, that a small democracy like Israel has no right to defend itself adequately, and that eventually a great power like the United States will intervene to rein in the Israelis when Arafat wants. It has worked like magic. The only desperately depressing news is that president George W. Bush has enabled Arafat to do this. It's okay for us to fight terror, apparently. It isn't okay for Israel."

"Terrorist says orders come from Arafat" (Matthew Kalman, USA Today, 2002/03/14)
"A leader of the largest Palestinian terrorist group spearheading suicide bombings and other attacks against Israel says he is following the orders of Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. "Our group is an integral part of Fatah," says Maslama Thabet, 33, a leader of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. Fatah, headed by Arafat, is the largest group in the Palestinian Authority, the government of the autonomous Palestinian territories. ... "The truth is, we are Fatah itself, but we don't operate under the name of Fatah," he said in a recent interview. 'We are the armed wing of the organization. We receive our instructions from Fatah. Our commander is Yasser Arafat himself.'"

"No Equivalence - Bush's men should know better than to liken soldiers to suicide bombers" (The Wall Street Journal, 2002/03/14)
"In short, the targeting of innocents is Mr. Arafat's explicit strategy to address the "grievance" of Israeli occupation. Israel, on the other hand, has pursued a policy of carefully targeting militants, and has been risking its soldiers over the past week to arrest suspects and confiscate weapons in Palestinian towns and refugee camps. Some non-combatants have been killed, but there is no moral equivalence here - certainly not the kind implied by U.S. proposals for monitors to keep peace between the two sides, or by Colin Powell's declaration last week that "if you declare war on the Palestinians and think you can solve the problem by seeing how many Palestinians can be killed, I don't know if that leads us anywhere." The message all this sends Mr. Arafat is unmistakable: Ratchet up suicidal bombings of Israeli civilians, induce a military response, and the U.S. will heavily pressure Israel for concessions."

Wednesday, March 13, 2002

News and commentary:

"U.S. and Afghan Troops Overrun Rebel Cave Complex" (Barry Bearak, The New York Times, 2002/03/13)
"A United States military official said today that Afghan and American troops had overrun the cave complex in the Shah-i-Kot Valley and were now chasing the remnants of the Taliban and Al Qaeda forces. ... Operation Anaconda, the work of a United States-led coalition, was symbolically named by the Americans after the snake that surrounds its prey in its coils. But three Afghan commanders interviewed about Tuesday's attack said that many rebels had probably slipped the noose. The oft-repeated ultimatum, surrender or die, may have been less apt a slogan for the situation than skedaddle and live."

"Saudi Government Daily: Jews Use Teenagers' Blood for 'Purim' Pastries" (Special Dispatch No. 354, MEMRI, 2002/03/13)
The ancient anti-Semitic "blood libel" in a contemporary version:
"In an article published by the Saudi government daily Al-Riyadh, columnist Dr. Umayma Ahmad Al-Jalahma of King Faysal University in Al-Dammam, wrote on "The Jewish Holiday of Purim." Following are excerpts of the article":
"Before I go into the details, I would like to clarify that the Jews' spilling human blood to prepare pastry for their holidays is a well-established fact, historically and legally, all throughout history. This was one of the main reasons for the persecution and exile that were their lot in Europe and Asia at various times. ...
For this holiday, the victim must be a mature adolescent who is, of course, a non-Jew – that is, a Christian or a Muslim. His blood is taken and dried into granules. The cleric blends these granules into the pastry dough; they can also be saved for the next holiday." (See also: "'Blood libel' alive and well" (Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily, 2000/11/30))

"Al Qaeda's Iranian escape hatch" (Richard Z. Chesnoff, Jewish World Review, 2002/03/13)
"Senior counterterrorist agents in Europe have told me that, despite emphatic denials by the Iranian government, fugitive troops loyal to Osama Bin Laden continue to slip freely across Afghanistan's 600-mile border with Iran. From there, say the sources, they are being smuggled by members of Iran's Revolutionary Guard to a variety of countries in the Middle East, South America and possibly elsewhere. The sources, whose information has proved reliable in the past, say that since mid-January, more than 50 Al Qaeda operatives have reached Lebanon via the clandestine Iranian route. Hundreds more reportedly are waiting to leave the Islamic Republic in the same way."

"The Phases of Arafat" (Michael Kelly, The Washington Post, 2002/03/13)
"The so-called Saudi plan currently on the table is a cynical and moth-eaten fraud put forth by a cynical and moth-eaten regime. In its ultimate proposals - the abandonment of Jerusalem, the return of all Palestinian refugees - it is purposely unworkable. Israel should nevertheless grasp it (or something equally unrealistic) as the basis for a new round of negotiations. This won't produce peace. But Israel can learn from Arafat's strategy; the great thing now is to take the long view - and meanwhile move the war to the next phase."

"Say That Again?" (Thomas L. Friedman, The New York Times, 2002/03/13)
"If Abdullah lets his message get watered down, it will signal not only that the Palestinians can't make real peace with Israel, but that the Arabs can't either. Therefore, no real acceptance of a Jewish state in the Middle East is possible — even if Israel fulfills all Arab requirements. For the Arab world, that would mean that bin Laden and Syria are in the driver's seat and that the Arab past will continue to bury the Arab future. That's why the real question before this Arab summit is: Can the Arabs answer bin Laden by positing a different vision? Can the Arab-Muslim world show a willingness to live with pluralism — with a Jewish state in fair boundaries? Or must the area be free of all "infidels"? An Arab League that can't live with a pluralism of people can't live with a pluralism of ideas. If it can't live with a pluralism of ideas, it will never develop and will remain, at some level, alienated from the West and Israel."

"UN backs Palestinian state" (BBC News, 2002/03/13)
"The United Nations has for the first time passed a resolution calling for a Palestinian state alongside Israel. The US-drafted document "affirming a vision" of a Palestinian state was backed by 14 out of 15 members of the Security Council. The Palestinians praised the move, while Israel said it welcomed a "balanced" resolution. ... Earlier, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan delivered his toughest statement yet on the violence. Mr Annan condemned Palestinian suicide attacks as "morally repugnant" and said he was "profoundly disturbed" by Israel's use of heavy weaponry in civilian areas." (Note: As The Wall Street Journal's Best of the Web Today points out it's rather the first Security Council resolution to back a Palestinian state as "the General Assembly way back in 1947 endorsed a partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states. The Arabs, of course, rejected the plan and launched a war against the incipient Jewish state.")

Tuesday, March 12, 2002

News and commentary:

"Israel in massive new offensive" (BBC News, 2002/03/12)
"The Israeli army has sent thousands of troops backed by tanks and helicopter gunships into Palestinian areas of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in a massive operation to round up militants. Thirty Palestinians are reported to have been killed and hundreds taken into custody in what BBC Middle East correspondent James Reynolds describes as Israel's biggest ground offensive for 20 years."

"Al-Qa'ida Activist, Abu 'Ubeid Al Qurashi: Comparing Munich (Olympics) Attack 1972 to September 11" (Special Dispatch No. 353, MEMRI, 2002/03/12)
"According to the London Arabic-language daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, Al-Qurashi is a bin Laden activist, and Al-Anssar is published by Al-Qa'ida.": "There are data attesting to the importance of the Munich operation in the history of the resistance movement, and the extent of its influence on the entire world. It is known that a direct consequence of this operation was that thousands of young Palestinians were roused to join the fedayeen organizations… The number of organizations engaging in international 'terror' increased from a mere 11 in 1968 to 55 in 1978. ... This increase in 'terror' activity after Munich will doubtless recur, particularly if we take into account that the New York raid was a political, economic, and military disaster for America, 10 times greater than that of the Munich operation... It will gradually give rise to an all-out struggle against the American crusader campaign which, if it continues to spread, will strike at the heart of America."

"Two Stubborn Men, and Many Dead" (Amos Oz, The New York Times, 2002/03/12)
A perfect example of the black magic of moral equivalency, not only comparing Arafat to Sharon, but fusing them together: "Sometimes during these nights I see these two men fused into the persona of an ancient warrior, a wicked Nero, amusing himself by playing with fire, laughing savagely while stoking the flames. ... I suspect that even the Siamese twins, Mr. Sharon and Mr. Arafat — I now call them "Mr. Sharafat" — know this. But fear and stagnation stifle them both. They are living under the dominion of a bloodstained past. They are hostages to one another, so much so that the entire historical dynamic of the conflict of the Middle East has become captive to their fears, their immobility." (See also: "The algebra of infinite justice" (Arundhati Roy, The Guardian, 2001/09/29), in which Roy uses the same trick: "What is Osama bin Laden? He's America's family secret. He is the American president's dark doppelgänger. The savage twin of all that purports to be beautiful and civilised. He has been sculpted from the spare rib of a world laid to waste by America's foreign policy... ... Now that the family secret has been spilled, the twins are blurring into one another and gradually becoming interchangeable.")

"Powell was right" (Evelyn Gordon, The Jerusalem Post, 2002/03/12)
"Powell intended his point to be that military action is incapable of stopping Palestinian terror. That is the accepted leftist wisdom: that guerrilla warriors fighting for self-determination can never be vanquished. Historically speaking, of course, that is nonsense. History is rife with examples to the contrary, from the Roman defeat of Jewish guerrillas fighting to regain their independence 2,000 years ago, to the American defeat of Indian guerrillas fighting to regain their lost land. However, it is also irrelevant - because the current Palestinian violence is not guerrilla warfare, but rather warfare backed by a recognized government. Indeed, the lion's share of fatal Palestinian attacks are now being committed by an organization that answers directly to Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat, the Al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades, which is a wing of Arafat's own Fatah party. For government-sponsored warfare, there are certainly military solutions, but to succeed, they require a clear objective: the defeat of the enemy government. Sharon, however, has consistently refused to set that as his objective, and his military strikes are patently not directed at that aim. Without such an objective, Powell is quite correct - Sharon's military action is leading nowhere."

Monday, March 11, 2002

News and commentary:

"No more Mr. Nice Guy" (Martin Walker, UPI, 2001/03/11)
"In global terms, the impact of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks was to end that curious twilight decade that we called the post-Cold War period. We are all now living in a new era altogether, and a lot of scholars and thinkers are trying to define it. Only President George W. Bush wants to call it the age of the War on Terrorism. Max Boot in the Weekly Standard has hailed the coming of a new American Empire. ... Russian thinker Semen Novoprudsky calls it the emergence (and Russia's absorption into) "the Empire of Good" in which America becomes "the exclusive exporter of liberal values to the savage outposts of the modern world." The point is that Novoprudsky, though a supporter of liberal values, fears the trend could be dangerous, as the Americans take over the traditional Russian role of stabilizing Central Asia. In a sense, all of these various new descriptions are right, because they are all grappling with the same two hard facts. The first is that in his "with us or against us" speech, Bush has redefined the nature of American friendship and alliance. Henceforth, the mission will define the coalition, rather than the coalition defining the mission - which may not bode well for NATO as we have known it. ... And there is one more measure of the way the world has changed in the past six months. Most thoughtful commentators, when considering the concept of American Empire in the past, would stress that it was essentially benign and even benevolent, seeking not conquest but the extension of its own freedoms and prosperity to others. The benevolence is over. If we think about it, we know what new world we are living in; it is the era of No More Mr. Nice Guy."

"Bush: September 11 terrorists' day of 'reckoning'" (CNN.com, 2002/03/11)
"Recalling the horror, heroism and haunting images of September 11, President Bush on Monday implored governments across the globe to join the war against "terrorist parasites." ... "September 11 was not the beginning of global terror, but it was the beginning of the world's concerted response," Bush said. 'History will know that day not only as a day of tragedy, but as a day of decision, when the civilized world was stirred to anger and to action. And the terrorists will remember September 11 as the day their reckoning began.'" (See also Presidents Bush's remarks on the six-month anniversary of the September 11:th attacks: "President Thanks World Coalition for Anti-Terrorism Efforts")

"Listen to the Kuwaitis" (Victor Davis Hanson, National Review, 2002/03/11)
"On film, dozens of Western-educated, yuppified Kuwaitis smugly expressed outright enmity for the United States - making past reports somewhat more understandable that infants born last year in the kingdom were named after bin Laden and that a vast majority opposes our efforts in Afghanistan. Those who were educated over here seemed to be the most virulently anti-American. ... Instead, once again as in the case of the terrorists who incinerated our citizens on Sept. 11, murdered Danny Pearl, and are planning more mayhem for us all, public opinion in Kuwait confirms that the root of anti-Americanism is not poverty (they are rich), not exploitation (they do not give oil away), not past grievance (we saved them), not purported solidarity with the Palestinians (whom they ejected), but a basic sense of umbrage and accompanying envy that grows with greater exposure to the West."

"Arafat vs the war on terror" (The Jerusalem Post, 2002/03/11)
"Much has been made of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's dropping his demand for seven terror-free days before implementing the Tenet cease-fire plan. But Sharon was not the only one to make concessions to terrorism; by sending envoy Anthony Zinni back to the region, US President George W. Bush dumped his own requirement that Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat fight terrorism before US mediation efforts resumed. These twin concessions pose serious questions - not just for the situation here, but for the global war on terrorism led by the United States. ... What has not sunk in is that as long as Palestinian goals are not threatened, and indeed are advanced, by the means they have chosen, they have little reason to abandon those means."

"Ending the War Process" (William Safire, The New York Times, 2002/03/11)
"The unspeakable is still printable here, however. Then-Prime Minister Ehud Barak, desperate for a deal that would get him re-elected, made egregious concessions of land that would have endangered Israel. Bill Clinton, eager to wash away memory of his transgressions, pressed Barak for even more concessions to appease Yasir Arafat. That Saudi-sponsored Palestinian, seeing Israel's panicked leader on the run, was thus emboldened to make greater demands. Envisioning total victory, he launched the terror war on civilians. That's what happened. ... That history, frantically being buried by diplomatists, is exhumed to draw its lessons: One is that unilateral compromise is appeasement, which only whets the appetite of Arab extremists. Another is that the prospect of intervention — by the U.S., U.N. or Europeans — gives Palestinian terrorists an incentive to prolong the bloodshed in hopes a horrified world will coerce Israel into submission."

 

See the archive for earlier news and commentary.

 

Copyright © Watch 2001-2006. Copyrights of quoted materials
belong to their respective owners.

"When people accept futility and the absurd as normal, the culture is decadent. The term is not a slur; it is a technical label."

Jacques Barzun

Articles of the week

"Losing the Enlightenment" (Victor Davis Hanson, OpinionJournal, 2006/11/29)

"Allah’s England?" (Daniel Johnson, Commentary. November 2006)

"'Sex in the Park': The latest doings of the Danish imams" (Henrik Bering, The Weekly Standard, 2006/11/18)

"Narcissism on Stilts" (Harold Evans, New York Sun, 2006/11/16)

"Terrorists are recruiting in our schools, says MI5 boss" (Philip Johnston, The Daily Telegraph, 2006/11/10)

› AOTW Archive



From the archives

Oriana Fallaci, R.I.P.

"The Rage, the Pride and the Doubt" (Oriana Fallaci, The Wall Street Journal, 2003/03/13)

"How the West Was Won and How It Will Be Lost" (Oriana Fallaci, The American Enterprise, from the January/February 2003 issue)

"On Jew-hatred in Europe" (Oriana Fallaci, dennisprager.com, 2002/04/13)

"Anger and Pride" (Oriana Fallaci, dennisprager.com, 2001/12/19)

Weekly archive

2006/12/04 - 2006/12/10
2006/11/27 - 2006/12/03
2006/11/20 - 2006/11/26
2006/11/13 - 2006/11/19
2006/11/06 - 2006/11/12
2006/10/30 - 2006/11/05

› From 2001/09/11 -



Monthly index

December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006

› From September 2001 -



Author index

› Ajami, Fouad - Johnson, Paul
› Kagan, Robert - Ye'or, Bat



Support Watch

Please feel free to donate if you enjoy the daily content and links Watch provides:

Contact Watch

Email:
watch-at-windsofchange.net