| |

Archived
news and commentary: February 11 - 17, 2002
2002/03/25
- 2002/03/31
2002/03/18
- 2002/03/24
2002/03/11
- 2002/03/17
2002/03/04
- 2002/03/10
2002/02/25
- 2002/03/03
2002/02/18
- 2002/02/24
2002/02/11 - 2002/02/17
2002/02/04
- 2002/02/10
2002/01/28
- 2002/02/03
2002/01/21
- 2002/01/27
2002/01/14 - 2002/01/20
2002/01/07 - 2002/01/13
2002/01/01
- 2002/01/06

Sunday,
February 17, 2002
News and commentary:
"An
Intriguing Signal From the Saudi Crown Prince" (Thomas
L. Friedman, The New York Times, 2002/02/17)
"After I laid out this idea, the crown prince [Abdullah] looked
at me with mock astonishment and said, "Have you broken into my
desk?" "No," I said, wondering what he was talking about.
"The reason I ask is that this is exactly the idea I had in mind
full withdrawal from all the occupied territories, in accord
with U.N. resolutions, including in Jerusalem, for full normalization
of relations," he said. 'I have drafted a speech along those lines.
My thinking was to deliver it before the Arab summit and try to mobilize
the entire Arab world behind it. The speech is written, and it is in
my desk. But I changed my mind about delivering it when Sharon took
the violence, and the oppression, to an unprecedented level.'"
"The
Politics of Dead Children - Have sanctions against Iraq murdered millions?"
(Matt Welch, Reason, from the March 2002 issue)
"Yet the basic argument against all economic sanctions remains:
namely, that they tend to punish civilians more than governments and
to provide dictators with a gift-wrapped propaganda tool. Any visitor
to Cuba can see within 24 hours the futility of slapping an embargo
on a sheltered population that is otherwise inclined to detest its government
and embrace its yanqui neighbors. Sanctions give anti-American enclaves,
whether in Cairo or Berkeley or Peshawar, one of their few half-convincing
arguments about evil U.S. policy since the end of the Cold War. It seems
awfully hard not to conclude that the embargo on Iraq has been ineffective
(especially since 1998) and that it has, at the least, contributed to
more than 100,000 deaths since 1990. With Bush set to go to war over
Saddams noncompliance with the military goals of the sanctions,
there has never been a more urgent time to confront the issue with clarity."

Saturday,
February 16, 2002
News and commentary:
"Is
this how bin Laden escaped?" (Bruce Anderson,
The Spectator, from the 2002/02/16 issue)
"It is to be hoped that someone will eventually write an account
of the battle of Tora Bora, for it was a feat of arms; an epic of skill
and courage, even by the standards of the SAS. ... By the end of the
battle, the SAS was certain that it knew where bin Laden was: in a mountain
valley, where he could have been trapped. ... It seems unlikely that
bin Laden could have been bagged without casualties. The men on the
ground did not quail at that prospect; the generals on the radio did.
They wanted Delta Force to kill bin Laden; they were not prepared to
allow their men to be killed in the process. ... So strategy was sabotaged
by schizoid irresolution. There followed hours of fiffing and faffing,
while gold coins were helicoptered in, to encourage the Northern Alliance.
The USA is the greatest military power in the history of the planet,
spending well over $300 billion a year on defence, yet everything was
paralysed because it would not allow its fighting men to fight. While
the generals agonised about bodybags, bin Laden was escaping. ... It
is now time for Donald Rumsfeld to retire a number of his Vietnamised,
risk-averse generals, and to replace them with warriors. After all,
he will shortly have a war to fight."
"What
about the French?" (James C. Bennett, UPI, 2002/02/16)
"Since Sept. 11, despite the genuine sympathy of the ordinary French
in the street for the victims, the response of the elite elements has
too often been pessimism, obstructionism, unfounded criticism and in
general the same old blame-America malaise that they share with the
rest of the Continental elite classes. ... The French are not a nation
of cowards, as the "surrender-monkey" epithet implies. They
are a nation of talented, creative, and brave individuals. Unfortunately,
they seem to alternate being led by a crowd of moral dwarves, alleviated
by the rule of the occasional flawed giant. It has been three decades
since the last such grand, albeit irritating, giant disappeared. What
gives France its current bad name has been the pack of moral munchkins
in charge ever since."

Friday,
February 15, 2002
News and commentary:
"Simplistic
Criticism of U.S. Overlooks Complex Realities" (Klaus-Dieter
Frankenberger, Frankfurter Allgemeine English Edition, 2002/02/15)
"Those who are not indifferent to the transatlantic partnership
will have to find the right answers. Strong words originating at least
in part from simplistic anti-Americanism lead nowhere. On the other
hand, if the Americans allow themselves to become and to be seen as
arrogant, it will create opposition not just within the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization but throughout the West and beyond. The new honeymoon
is indeed over."
"Arrogance,
ignorance and the real new world order" (Tim
Hames, The Times, 2002/02/15)
"If European politicians dislike American unilateralism, therefore,
they should ponder the alternative. It would be an international order
in which the United States rested, to borrow from Ronald Reagan, as
"a shining city on a hill" while anarchy reigned supreme in
the valleys. We have had at least one period of history with no dominant
power at all - let alone a benign, democratic, one. It is known, quite
rightly, as the Dark Ages."

Thursday,
February 14, 2002
News and commentary:
"Qaeda
Deputy Reported to Plan New Attacks" (Philip
Shenon and James Risen, The New York Times, 2002/02/14)
"An elusive 30-year-old Palestinian who travels the world using
false passports and multiple aliases has emerged as the new chief of
operations for Al Qaeda and is now believed to be organizing remnants
of the terrorist network to carry out new attacks against the United
States, American officials said. The Palestinian, Abu Zubaydah, has
been linked directly to the planning of the Sept. 11 strikes in the
United States. He has also been tied to plans for a wave of terror attacks
in Europe that were supposed to take place last year, including a plot
to blow up the American Embassy in Sarajevo, the Bosnian capital, sometime
after Sept. 11. While the European attacks were thwarted by the arrest
of several plotters, American investigators said they were convinced
that Mr. Zubaydah was now trying to activate Qaeda sleeper cells for
new strikes on the United States and its allies."
"Left's
Got Columbia in a Stew" (Jaime Sneider, New
York Daily News, 2002/02/14)
"The most active student organization opposed to the war is known
as People for Peace. It decries military strikes and other measures
taken to defend national security. Outlining the People for Peace philosophy
to me, one member gave the example of a missile heading toward a densely
populated American city. According to him, 'If they [the city's citizens]
were a moral and enlightened people, they would wait patiently for death,
encouraging a spirit of nonviolence.'"
"Arafat
takes blame for arms shipment" (BBC News, 2002/02/14)
"The United States says Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat has accepted
responsibility for an attempt to smuggle arms on board a ship intercepted
by Israel last month. Until now, Mr Arafat had denied any knowledge
of the affair, which cast a shadow over US efforts to implement a ceasefire
between the two sides. ... Mr Arafat's comments came in a letter to
US Secretary of State Colin Powell. "He [Arafat] wrote me a letter
three days ago on the Karine-A, accepting responsibility - not personal
responsibility, but as chairman of the Palestinian Authority,"
Mr Powell told a Congressional committee." (Note
that Arafat blamed the Karine A incident on the Israelis just a couple
of days ago: "Retracting earlier comments blaming Hizbullah, Palestinian
Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat said in remarks published today that
Israel was behind an arms shipment captured by Israeli commandos last
month. In an interview with Lebanon's An-Nahar newspaper, Arafat said
Israel's intelligence service, Mossad, had engineered the arms ship
episode as a blow against the Palestinians, Iran and Lebanon's militant
Hizbullah group."("Arafat:
Israel behind Karine A weapons shipment", The Jerusalem Post/AP,
2002/02/12))

Wednesday,
February 13, 2002
News and commentary:
"Which
god has failed" (Paul Hollander, The New Criterion,
from the February 2002 issue)
A brilliant essay on the fascinating fact that socialism and Marxism
still are viable despite more than 80 years of totalitarian tyranny
and catastrophical economical results: "Ramsey Clark (born 1927)
has converted his rejection of American society into fervent support
for Saddam Hussein's Iraq and virtually any movement, or country, opposed
to his own. As he notes in Challenge to Genocide: Let Iraq Live,
this unique embodiment of evil, the United States, "has created
weapons systems and executed plans to devastate a small and defenceless
country [i.e., Iraq]
first with a direct assault by fire, then
with more deadly ice of enforced isolation, malnutrition, and impoverishment
. There was no war. No combat. There was only a deliberate, systematic
genocide of a defenseless population." ... Residual sympathy for
leftist ideas and systems lingers because it is part and parcel of the
wider currents of hostility to Western ideas and institutions, such
as multiculturalism, radical feminism, postmodernism, deconstruction,
and anti-globalism. All these are, in turn, nurtured by the continuing
quest for spiritual values which would transcend the benefits that a
market economy, consumer society, and political democracy offer. Russell
Jacoby, in The End of Utopia, rightly says that multiculturalism and
the other trends noted have become substitutes for the utopian longings
and beliefs discredited by the experience and fall of Communist systems:
'Bereft of ideas, leftists and liberals
celebrate cultural pluralism
to fill the void
the demise of utopia makes way for the party
of multiculturalists.'"
"As
Good as Doctrine Gets" (Michael Kelly, The Washington
Post, 2002/02/13)
"The chief points for the "axis of evil" doctrine may
be seen in considering the chief points against it... It is simplistic,
or simple-minded, as the French foreign minister, whose name is Petain
or Maginot or something, sniffed last week. C'est vrai. It is indeed
"simplisme" to pick fights with evil regimes just because
those regimes want to kill you or enslave you or at least force you
to knuckle under and collaborate in their evil, when one might choose
the far safer and far more profitable path of shrugging one's shoulders
in a fetchingly Gallic fashion and sending one's Jews off to the camps,
as one's new masters in government request. On the other hand, as the
foreign minister might have noticed, the French may today enjoy springtime
in Paris without the annoying sounds of jackboots all over the place,
and the reason for that was the simple-minded determination of the British,
the Russians and the Americans to fight the Nazis and to die by the
millions, in order to make the world safe for, among other creatures,
future French foreign ministers. "Simplisme" works. Against
evil, it is the only thing that does."

Tuesday,
February 12, 2002
News and commentary:
"What
We're Fighting For: A Letter from America" (Institute
for American Values, 2002/02/12)
A letter signed by 60 American intellectuals - Fukuyama and Huntington,
for example - on why the war on terrorism is justified:
"At times it becomes necessary for a nation to defend itself through
force of arms. Because war is a grave matter, involving the sacrifice
and taking of precious human life, conscience demands that those who
would wage the war state clearly the moral reasoning behind their actions,
in order to make plain to one another, and to the world community, the
principles they are defending.
We affirm five fundamental truths that pertain to all people without
distinction:
1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
2. The basic subject of society is the human person, and the legitimate
role of government is to protect and help to foster the conditions for
human flourishing.
3. Human beings naturally desire to seek the truth about life's purpose
and ultimate ends.
4. Freedom of conscience and religious freedom are inviolable rights
of the human person.
5. Killing in the name of God is contrary to faith in God and is the
greatest betrayal of the universality of religious faith.
We fight to defend ourselves and to defend these universal principles."
"'If
you need terrorist allies you think Iraq'" (Oliver
Burkeman, The Guardian, 2002/02/12)
An interview with Kanan Makiya, "Iraq's most eminent dissident
thinker": "[Cruelty and Silence] fiercely attacked Arab intellectuals
in the west for colluding, through their silence, in the atrocities
being committed in the Arab world. In placing the fight for Palestinian
sovereignty before everything else, he argued, they gave succour to
Saddam's campaigns of extermination. ... The hysterical anti-Americanism
that created Osama bin Laden and motivated the attacks on New York and
Washington is a psychosis in the Arab world now, Makiya says - "a
sickly, thought-killing resentment". It may be rooted in legitimate
grievances: America's backing of anti-Palestinian policies; George Bush
Sr's abandonment of the Iraqi opposition after the Gulf war. But now
it has ballooned into a resentful victimhood that blinds its followers
to failures closer to home, and specifically to the prevalence of savage
dictatorships and the absence of democracy among the Arab nations. ...
"Forget about Osama bin Laden - he's a walking dead man. It's the
next generation, hundreds of them, who will come out of a place like
Iraq," he says. "September 11 set a whole new standard as
to what could be achieved, and if you're in the terrorism business you're
going to start thinking big, and you're going to need allies. And if
you need allies in the terrorism business, you're going to think Iraq."
Even to ask why America is hated, as so many leftwing commentators have
done, is to concede to the terrorists' view that their anti-Americanism
is essentially valid and to accept their attempt to blur the line between
resentful elements in the Arab world and the whole of Islam."
"Attack
Possible in U.S. or Yemen, the F.B.I. Warns" (David
Johnston, The New York Times, 2002/02/12)
"Based on information law enforcement officials said was obtained
from detainees being held at Guantánamo Bay, the F.B.I. tonight
issued a new security threat alert, more specific than any one before,
warning of the possibility of an attack as early as Tuesday in the United
States or Yemen. ... "Recent information indicates a planned attack
may occur in the United States or against U.S. interests on or around
Feb. 12, 2002," the alert said. 'One or more operatives may be
involved in the attack.'"

Monday,
February 11, 2002
News and commentary:
"Review:
Afghan Civilian Deaths Lower" (Laura King, AP/Yahoo!
News, 2002/02/11)
"Although estimates have placed the civilian dead in the thousands,
a review by The Associated Press suggests the toll may be in the mid-hundreds,
a figure reached by examining hospital records, visiting bomb sites
and interviewing eyewitnesses and officials. ... Afghan journalists
for the official Bakhtar news agency, whose reports were used as a basis
for Taliban claims, now say their dispatches were freely doctored. Mohammed
Ismail - then a Bakhtar reporter, promoted to acting director after
the Taliban fled - told AP that in one typical instance, he went to
the scene of an airstrike in Kabul's Khair Khana neighborhood on Oct.
20 and saw eight bodies. "But it was changed in our dispatch to
20," he said. When he heard the report later on Taliban-run radio,
the figure had gone up to 30, he said." (See also:
"Annabel
Croft can't take on Accrington Stanley" (Mark Steyn, The Daily
Telegraph, 2002/01/19))
"Arab
Press Glorifies Bomber as Heroine" (James Bennet,
The New York Times, 2002/02/11)
"Ms. Idris, 28, has been hailed in the Arabic-language press as
striking a blow not only against Israel but also for woman's equality
by blowing herself up on Jaffa Road here two weeks ago, killing an 81-year-old
man and wounding many other people. She has been compared to Joan of
Arc, the Mona Lisa and the Virgin Mary. "From Mary's womb issued
a child who eliminated oppression, while the body of Wafa became shrapnel
that eliminated despair and aroused hope," Dr. Adel Sadeq, head
of the department of psychiatry at Ein Shams University in Cairo, was
quoted as writing by the London- based newspaper Al Quds al Arabi. Dr.
Sadeq said that "it is not surprising that the enemy in both cases
was the same," apparently a reference to Jews."
"Hostile
Allies" (Doug Bandow, National Review, 2002/02/11)
"There are Christians, too, but Pakistan's beleaguered Christian
community accounts for barely two percent of the population. Religious
persecution has worsened since September 11. ... The oppression of Christians
is morally offensive. (One poor Christian complained to me: "We
are human beings like Muslims.") Such discrimination also hinders
the development of a more secular political culture, which would provide
a stronger barrier to Islamic fundamentalism. Of course, the Musharraf
government is better than a fundamentalist alternative. But he deserves
support only if he helps to contain the murderous impulses of a medieval
theology hostile to human life and dignity."
See
the archive
for earlier news and commentary.
Copyright © Watch 2001-2006. Copyrights of quoted materials
belong to their respective owners.
|
|


"When
people accept futility and the absurd as normal, the culture is decadent.
The term is not a slur; it is a technical label."
Jacques
Barzun

Articles
of the week
"Losing
the Enlightenment" (Victor Davis Hanson, OpinionJournal,
2006/11/29)
"Allah’s
England?" (Daniel Johnson, Commentary. November 2006)
"'Sex
in the Park': The latest doings of the Danish imams"
(Henrik Bering, The Weekly Standard, 2006/11/18)
"Narcissism
on Stilts" (Harold Evans, New York Sun, 2006/11/16)
"Terrorists
are recruiting in our schools, says MI5 boss" (Philip
Johnston, The Daily Telegraph, 2006/11/10)
AOTW Archive

From the archives

Oriana
Fallaci, R.I.P.
"The
Rage, the Pride and the Doubt" (Oriana Fallaci, The
Wall Street Journal, 2003/03/13)
"How
the West Was Won and How It Will Be Lost" (Oriana Fallaci,
The American Enterprise, from the January/February 2003 issue)
"On
Jew-hatred in Europe" (Oriana Fallaci, dennisprager.com,
2002/04/13)
"Anger
and Pride" (Oriana Fallaci, dennisprager.com, 2001/12/19)

Weekly archive
2006/12/04
- 2006/12/10
2006/11/27 - 2006/12/03
2006/11/20 - 2006/11/26
2006/11/13
- 2006/11/19
2006/11/06
- 2006/11/12
2006/10/30
- 2006/11/05
From
2001/09/11 -

Monthly
index
December
2006
November
2006
October
2006
September
2006
August
2006
July
2006
From
September 2001 -

Author index
Ajami,
Fouad - Johnson, Paul
Kagan,
Robert - Ye'or, Bat

Support
Watch
Please
feel free to donate if you enjoy the daily content and links Watch provides:
Contact
Watch
Email:
watch-at-windsofchange.net


|
|